POLITICAL SCIENCE–I UNIT-V
In the landscape of political thought, few figures are as influential and thought-provoking as Karl Marx and Mahatma Gandhi. At first glance, they may seem worlds apart; however, both aimed for social justice and equality. Their methods, though, reflect starkly different philosophies. Marx's focus was on economic structures and class struggles, advocating for revolutionary transformation, while Gandhi promoted non-violence and moral growth. This blog post examines their distinct political visions and offers insights into their contrasting approaches to justice.

In the landscape of political thought, few figures are as influential and thought-provoking as Karl Marx and Mahatma Gandhi. At first glance, they may seem worlds apart; however, both aimed for social justice and equality. Their methods, though, reflect starkly different philosophies. Marx's focus was on economic structures and class struggles, advocating for revolutionary transformation, while Gandhi promoted non-violence and moral growth. This blog post examines their distinct political visions and offers insights into their contrasting approaches to justice.
Karl Marx: The Revolutionary Thinker
The Historical Context
Karl Marx was born in 1818 in Germany, during a time of intense industrial change and social upheaval. Workers faced dreadful conditions, often laboring in factories for long hours, often over 12 hours a day, and receiving scant wages. Marx dedicated himself to exploring how capitalism exploited these laborers, leading to significant inequality.
His influential works, "The Communist Manifesto" and "Das Kapital," are foundational texts that articulate his theories. Central to Marx’s ideology is historical materialism, a concept stating that the material conditions of society drive its development, resulting in class struggles. For example, during the Industrial Revolution, the rapid growth of factories led to a clear divide between the wealthy industrialists and struggling workers.
The Class Struggle
Marx classified society primarily into two groups: the bourgeoisie, who owned the means of production, and the proletariat, who provided their labor. He described this dynamic as exploitative. The bourgeoisie grew rich at the expense of the working class, causing widespread alienation and social injustice.