Natural justice is not just a legal concept; it is the foundation of fair governance. It ensures that everyone has a fair opportunity to respond before decisions are made that could affect them. At its core, natural justice protects individuals from arbitrary actions by authorities. This post explores the key principles of natural justice, the grounds for judicial control of administrative decisions, and the role of judicial review in ensuring accountability.

Understanding these concepts is vital for anyone engaged in public service or legal practice, as they illuminate the path toward fair and just administrative actions.

Principles of Natural Justice

Natural justice revolves around two primary principles: audi alteram partem (the right to a fair hearing) and nemo judex in causa sua (no one should be a judge in their own cause).

Audi Alteram Partem

The audi alteram partem principle mandates that individuals affected by decisions must be offered a chance to present their case. For example, if a school board seeks to expel a student for misconduct, the student must be informed of the allegations and given a chance to defend themselves in a hearing. This process not only fosters fairness but also builds trust in administrative procedures.

Additionally, effective communication is essential. When decisions are made, administrative bodies should provide clear reasons for their conclusions. For instance, if a driver's license is revoked for unsafe driving, the agency should explain the specifics of the violations, allowing the individual to understand the rationale behind the decision and respond appropriately.