top of page
Search
Result
प्रकार
श्रेणी
"" के लिए 178 आइटम मिली
- There should be strong prima facie case for ordering DNA test: Allahabad High CourtHigh Court Judgment में·August 8, 2022Case Title: Mohan Singh Vs State Of UP And Another Bench: Justice Gautam Choudhary Citation: Application u/s 482 No. – 1621 of 2022 The Allahabad High Court on Saturday ruled that DNA testing can be ordered routinely and only in deserving cases where a strong prima facie case is made out. A division bench of Justice Gautam Choudhary was hearing a petition challenging the order passed by the Additional District Judge. In this case an FIR was registered by Hardev Singh in a case filed under Section 302 of IPC that Mohan Singh (applicant) misbehaved and shot his mother. The accused filed an application under section 233 CrPC stating that the prosecution may be directed to provide the blood sample of the family members of the victim and to conduct a DNA test of the blood collected from earth May be sent to a forensic laboratory, to ensure whether the two are identical. But the said application was rejected. The applicant's counsel Shri Gaurav Kakkar submitted that a DNA test cannot be done where there is a violation of the right to life or privacy of a person and it should be used after weighing and satisfying all the pros and cons of whether testing is warranted or not. It was further argued that in the instant case the right to life would be violated or any stigma would be imposed on the privacy of the family members of the deceased and hence there is an extreme need for a DNA test to prove the innocence of the applicant. The issue before the bench for consideration was: Shri Amit Singh, the counsel for the opposite side, submitted that, if a person refuses to undergo a DNA test, he cannot be compelled/forced to do so as the informant or his family members are also required to test for DNA. cannot be forced. The following questions were before the court: • Can scientific knowledge be used to find the truth? • If instructed is given to do a DNA test what will be its effect • Can the test give life or privacy right be violated? Considering the first issue, the High Court observed that the rejection of an application for DNA test and providing an opportunity to produce documentary or oral evidence in respect of his innocence by the Court below is nothing but an age-old practice, notwithstanding his In front of the availability of scientific methods available and therefore the scientific method should be used to find out the truth because justice is best served by truth. Considering the second issue, the bench observed that "If the DNA is directed to be conducted and the DNA matched, the accused can be convicted. If the DNA does not match, ten convicts are released, following the established and basic principles that no innocent should be convicted, in order to arrive at a just and impartial decision of the case. If the DNA sample is not matched, the argument of innocence of the applicant will be proved and he is being falsely implicated in the present case. Responding to the third question, the High Court observed that the DNA test has not been asked to establish the link between the applicant and the informer, but has been requested to prove the innocence of the applicant, therefore, there will be no impediment to his personal Freedom and right to privacy of the informer or his family members. The bench observed that "DNA testing should not be routinely directed and such direction can be given only in deserving cases where a strong prima facie case is made out". Since the life of the applicant is at stake as he is accused of an offense under section 302 of the IPC, it is necessary for the prosecution to ascertain and examine the veracity of the case. In view of the above, the High Court set aside the impugned order and said that it would be in the interest of justice that DNA test can be done.001
- What is the basic difference between Section / Rule / Article/ActGeneral & Legal Discussion में·August 7, 2022The difference between Section / Rule / Article / Act has been listed below: - Section A section refers to a distinct portion or provision of a legal code or set of laws, often establishing a particular legal requirement. For example- Section 5 of the Indian Contract Act. Article When any fundamentally critical document is framed or drafted which might be a grundnorm (a fundamental norm to support all other legal norms according to Kelsian pure theory of law) of that system at political, national or international level, then for the most part, it is separated from the customary municipal laws by referring to its provisos as articles rather than sections. For example - United Nations Charter,International Conventions, Constitution of a country, and so on, from where different laws or rules originate. Otherwise, municipal laws normally contain sections. Rule A Rule is a subsidiary enactment that helps in governing law. They are secondary in nature, meaning thereby that they don’t have an independent existence of their own.They are made to make the parent Act function. The rules provide for the details that have not been provided for in the Act, however, Rules by no means can go beyond the power conferred by the ACT, or extend the same. Act An Act is a law that is passed by the legislature. It is also known as a statute. However,most laws are not complete code in themselves, i.e. certain provisions as to their application or enforcement, etc. are deliberately left out by the legislature due to which rules come into the picture. For example- Companies Act 2013 is an Act. It has several rules governing its operations such as Companies (Incorporation) Rules 2014. Sections comes under the Act whereas it makes us enable us to understand underwhich act it comes from. Likewise, articles and rules are also different but makes it easy to know under which article we have to make an application. An act is a bill which has passed through the various legislative steps required for it and which has become law. So, simply put, an act is the formally codiedresult of deliberation by a legislative body. An article is a separate and distinct part of a written instrument, such as a contract, statute, or constitution, that is often divided into sections. A written instrument, containing a series of rules and stipulations that are each designated as an article. A section is the distinct and numbered subdivisions in legal codes, statutes, and textbooks.The basic difference between an act, an article and a section would thus be that one is the sub-division of the other. It goes as Act (the biggest) which has articles that are divided into sections. In general, terms, when a Bill is proposed to be enacted, it shall be presented before the respected legislatures (law making bodies) for approval. After it is approved, the bill is presented before the president. The bill, with the consent of the president, shall come into force as an Act, a Law, or a Statute. An Article or a section which are numbered are meant to indicate or reflect a specific provision of an Act or a Law003
- National Lok Adalat disposed of 1 crore cases in a single dayGeneral & Legal Discussion में·August 15, 2022As an encouraging news, more than 1 crore cases have been settled in the National Lok Adalat held on 13th August. As per NALSA's press release, 25 lakh pending cases and over 75 lakh pre-litigation cases were disposed of in Lok Adalat. Lok Adalats were held in all Union Territories and States except Delhi under the leadership of Justice UU Lalit, who is also the Chairman of NALSA. Significantly, the Lok Adalat in Delhi was adjourned till August 20 as preparations for the Independence Day were underway. National Lok Adalats are organized by the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) to provide affordable and easy access to justice to the litigants. Through Lok Adalats, the government and the judiciary aim to reduce the burden on the courts by targeting pending cases. During his interaction with the stakeholders, Justice UU Lalit observed that Lok Adalats have created history by providing an alternative mechanism to the litigants to get satisfactory and timely dispute resolution.002
- Wife Can Seek CCTV Footage of Hotel to Prove Adultery by Husband- No Violation of Right to Privacy .High Court Judgment में·May 12, 2023Wife Can Seek CCTV Footage of Hotel to Prove Adultery by Husband- No Violation of Right to Privacy of Husband: Delhi HC The Delhi High Court has ruled that a wife’s right to seek redressal under the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act should prevail over her husband’s right to privacy when it comes to allegations of adultery. The court held that a woman has the right to seek evidence or documents to prove adultery in a divorce petition against her husband. The court also noted that the right to privacy, although a constitutionally protected right, is not an absolute right. In this case, the husband challenged two orders passed by a family court in relation to his alleged adultery. The wife had filed for divorce on the grounds of adultery and cruelty, citing evidence of her husband’s presence in a hotel where he was allegedly engaging in an adulterous relationship. The family court had allowed her application for the preservation of CCTV footage from the hotel in question and the summoning of the hotel room’s records. The husband moved to the High Court to challenge these orders. His counsel argued against the allegations of adultery and cruelty, claiming that his client was merely visiting a friend who was also staying at the hotel with her daughter. Moreover, he protested that the family court was carrying out a fishing and roving inquiry, and that the divulgence of private information sought by the wife would violate his right to privacy and that of the other individuals involved. However, the court held that a wife’s plea for records pertaining to her legally wedded husband, who she was alleging was indulging in adultery, must be given priority over the husband’s right to privacy in a subsisting marital relationship. The court also noted that there was no question of a violation of the right to privacy of the other lady, with whom the husband was allegedly living in adultery, and her minor child, as the family court had only sought records pertaining to the husband.006
- कानूनी पेशा अब पारिवारिक पेशा नहीं रह गया है, नए लोगों को वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता बनाने में प्रोत्साहित कियाSupreme Court Judgment में·May 13, 2023कानूनी पेशा अब पारिवारिक पेशा नहीं रह गया है, नए लोगों को वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता बनाने में प्रोत्साहित किया जाना चाहिए: सुप्रीम कोर्ट शुक्रवार को सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट और हाईकोर्ट में वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ताओं के पदनाम की व्यवस्था में सुधार पर विस्तृत फैसला सुनाया। जस्टिस एसके कौल, जस्टिस अहसानुद्दीन अमानुल्लाह और जस्टिस अरविंद कुमार की खंडपीठ ने सुश्री इंदिरा जय सिंह बनाम सुप्रीम कोर्ट ऑफ इंडिया (M.A. Nos. 709/2022, 1502/2020) के मामले में फैसला सुनाया। न्यायालय ने कहा: हम यह भी मानते हैं कि विविधता के हित में विशेष रूप से लिंग और पहली पीढ़ी के वकीलों के संबंध में उचित विचार किया जाना चाहिए। इससे मेधावी अधिवक्ताओं को प्रोत्साहन मिलेगा जो यह जानकर क्षेत्र में आएंगे कि शीर्ष पर पहुंचने की गुंजाइश है। इस पेशे में समय के साथ एक प्रतिमान बदलाव देखा गया है, विशेष रूप से नए कानून विद्यालयों जैसे कि राष्ट्रीय कानून विश्वविद्यालयों के आगमन के साथ। कानूनी पेशे को अब पारिवारिक पेशा नहीं माना जाता है। इसके बजाय, देश के सभी हिस्सों से और अलग-अलग पृष्ठभूमि वाले नए लोग आए हैं। ऐसे नवागंतुकों को प्रोत्साहित किया जाना चाहिए। सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने पदनाम के विभिन्न पहलुओं को कवर किया है जैसे कि गुप्त मतदान द्वारा मतदान, कट ऑफ मार्क्स, प्रकाशन के लिए अंक, रिपोर्ट किए गए और अप्रतिबंधित निर्णय, निशुल्क कार्य, कानून की विभिन्न शाखाओं के तहत एक आवेदक की डोमेन विशेषज्ञता, आयु, व्यक्तिगत साक्षात्कार और अन्य सामान्य पहलू। पृष्ठभूमि भारत में वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ताओं का पदनाम असाधारण अधिवक्ताओं को दिया जाने वाला एक प्रतिष्ठित खिताब है, जिन्होंने कानूनी पेशे में महत्वपूर्ण योगदान दिया है। यह शीर्षक क्षेत्र में एक वकील की स्थिति और उपलब्धियों की पहचान के लिए दिया जाता है, जो उन्हें किसी ऐसे व्यक्ति के रूप में अलग करता है जो ग्राहकों, न्यायपालिका और जनता को असाधारण सेवा प्रदान कर सकता है। वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ताओं को नामित करने की प्रणाली को चुनौती दी गई थी, जब सुश्री इंदिरा जयसिंह, जो स्वयं एक वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता थीं, ने 2015 में एक रिट याचिका दायर की थी। इस चुनौती के जवाब में, सुप्रीम कोर्ट की तीन-न्यायाधीशों की पीठ ने 12 अक्टूबर, 2017 को एक विस्तृत निर्णय जारी किया।001
- Justice UU Lalit (CJI nominated) announces 3 major reformsGeneral & Legal Discussion में·August 28, 2022Justice UU Lalit, the CJI-nominated, has made three major announcements regarding reforms during his 74-day tenure as the next Chief Justice of India. Speaking at the farewell function organized by SCBA (Supreme Court Bar Association) for outgoing CJI NV Ramana, Justice UU Lalit made the following announcements:- More transparency in the listing system. A system will be put in place to independently mention the instant list of cases. Efforts will be made that the Constitution Bench should function throughout the year. Justice UU Lalit began his address by saying that he cannot match the popularity of Justice Ramana. He also mentioned the two major achievements of CJI Ramana, clearing judicial vacancies and the importance given to judicial infrastructure. Justice UU Lalit pointed out that the efforts made by CJI Ramana and the National Legal Services Authority to set up legal aid defense lawyers in all districts are now visible. Significantly, Justice Lalit will be the 49th Chief Justice of India and he will take oath on August 27.002
- Section 13(1) (i-a) HMA: Mental cruelty must be of such a nature that the parties cannot reasonablyHigh Court Judgment में·December 31, 2022Recently, The Chattisgarh HC stated that mental cruelty must be of such a nature that the parties cannot reasonably be expected to live together. The bench of Justices Goutam Bhaduri and Radhakishan Agrawal was dealing with the appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, whereby the petition filed by the wife/respondent for grant of decree of divorce was allowed. In this case, It is alleged by the wife/respondent that soon after the marriage, she was being tortured and harassed mentally and physically on different occasions by the appellant/husband in connection with the demand for dowry. Even during her pregnancy, she was ill-treated by her husband and dropped at her parental home. The husband also levelled false allegations on her character and on that ground sought divorce by filing a petition under Section 13 of the Act, 1955 which was subsequently dismissed by the Court. She filed a complaint case under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and an application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. for a grant of maintenance and also lodged a report under Section 498-A of IPC against him. The Family Court by the impugned judgment and decree allowed the suit and dissolved the marriage performed between the parties. The issue for consideration before the bench was: Whether the order passed by the Family Court needs interference or not? High Court referred to the case of V. Bhagat v. D. Bhagat, where it was held that mental cruelty in Section 13(1) (i-a) can broadly be defined as that conduct which inflicts upon the other party such mental pain and suffering as would make it not possible for that party to live with the other. In other words, mental cruelty must be of such a nature that the parties cannot reasonably be expected to live together. The situation must be such that the wronged party cannot reasonably be asked to put up with such conduct and continue to live with the other party. What is cruelty in one case may not amount to cruelty in another case. It is a matter to be determined in each case having regard to the facts and circumstances of that case. The bench noted that the husband and wife lodged criminal cases against each other, and the appellant used to doubt the character of the wife saying that she was having an affair with one Pankaj Agrawal even prior to the marriage. During the period of pregnancy also, when the wife was staying at her parental house at Belgahna, the appellant visited there, abused them filthily and extended a threat to kill them whereupon a report was lodged by the wife under Sections 294, 506-B read with Section 34 of IPC. High Court stated that the manner in which the husband treated the wife while she was residing with him & even while she was living at her parental house, it is evident that the husband subjected her to cruelty which forced her to leave her matrimonial home & stay at her parental home since 2014. Being so, the finding arrived at by the Court below granting a decree of divorce in favour of the wife does not call for any interference. In view of the above, the bench dismissed the appeal. Case Title: Sohil Agrawal v. Smt. Anjali Agrawal Bench: Justices Goutam Bhaduri and Radhakishan Agrawal Case No.: FAM No. 110 of 2018 Counsel for the appellant: Mr. Manish Nigam Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Sanjay Agrawal and Ms. Priyanka Shrivastava007
- Pay Commission: The wait for the 8th Pay Commission is over, the central government released a new uGeneral & Legal Discussion में·August 7, 2022Delhi, the discussions of the 8th Pay Commission coming for a long time are going on. One gets to hear something or the other every day they bring them. But there is doubt about when it will be implemented or whether it will be done or not. But now a new update has come from the Central Government regarding this. The Modi government has made it clear that the Eighth Pay Commission will not come. In Parliament, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Choudhary has termed any such claim on behalf of the government as baseless. In which it is being said to implement the 8th Central Pay Commission for revision in salary, allowances and pension of central employees and pensioners. The Union Minister of State for Finance, in a written reply to a question in Parliament, said that no such proposal is under consideration with the government. When Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Choudhary was asked whether it is true that the government is contemplating to implement the 8th Pay Commission to revise the salary, allowances and pension of Central Government employees and pensioners. So he said that there is no such scheme of the government, it is not going to come. The Union Minister of State for Finance said that for this it has been suggested that there should be changes in the pay metrics from time to time and for this there is no need for the next Pay Commission. In such a situation, it can be reviewed and amended on the basis of the Acroyd formula. It was expected that in early August, the central government may increase the employee and pensioner DA and DR by up to 4 percent due to rising inflation. But even this has not been decided yet. If the government increases the DA of central employees, then there will be a huge increase in their salary.007
- NIA Arrests a Kerala High Court Lawyer, Accused of Being Member of PFI Murder SquadHigh Court Judgment में·December 31, 2022The National Investigation Agency (NIA) arrested an Advocate practising in the Kerala High Court during raids on the homes of second-rung leaders of the banned Popular Front of India (PFI) in Kerala yesterday. The NIA apprehended Advocate Muhammed Mubarak during raids conducted in 56 different locations across Kerala early Thursday morning. His arrest was recorded today, and he appeared before the Special NIA Court in Ernakulam today. The Court has remanded him in custody until January 13. He is the fourteenth person arrested in Kerala by the NIA in connection with the PFI. He was apprehended in Vyppin, Ernakulam District, Kerala. According to the NIA, Muhammed Mubarak was a member of the PFI’s murder squad and was training other PFI members in martial arts. In recent years, the PFI has committed numerous murders in Kerala, including the heinous murder of Advocate Ranjith Sreenivasan. The NIA recovered lethal weapons from his home, including an axe, swords, and sickles. According to the NIA, the weapons were hidden in a badminton racket bag.009
- Delay in AIBE 17 (XVII) 2023 Result Issue Reaches Supreme Court- Lawyer Files Plea Says Right to....Supreme Court Judgment में·April 25, 2023Delay in AIBE 17 (XVII) 2023 Result Issue Reaches Supreme Court- Lawyer Files Plea Says Right to Livelihood is in Jeopardy A lawyer has filed a petition with the Supreme Court requesting the Bar Council of India (BCI) to announce the results of the 17th All India Bar Examination (AIBE), which took place in February 2021. The petitioner argues that failure to announce the AIBE results is jeopardizing her legal right to practice as an advocate, which will affect her source of income. According to the Petitioner, life can be miserable without a livelihood, and article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life as a fundamental right, including the right to livelihood. The AIBE is a mandatory examination for lawyers to enroll with a State Bar Council and engage in the practice of law. The delay in declaring the AIBE results is unreasonably abusing the BCI’s powers, and the petitioner has asked the Court to instruct the BCI to announce the results as soon as possible.008
- Supreme Court said on the petition seeking disciplinary action against the lawyer, go to the BCISupreme Court Judgment में·August 6, 2022Title: Ravjot Singh Vs Bar Council of India On Friday, the Supreme Court granted liberty to withdraw a petition seeking a direction to the Bar Council of India to initiate disciplinary proceedings against a senior advocate for professional misconduct under the Advocates Act 1961. A bench of Justices UU Lalit, Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ravindra Bhat granted liberty to the petitioner to withdraw the matter. The court had questioned the petitioner as to why did he approach the High Court when the appellate authority in this matter is the Bar Council of India. Before the court, the petitioner submitted that the BCI and the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana have refused to go against Section 5 of the Advocates Act 1961, under Senior Counsel. There is an allegation of felony conduct against the senior counsel for filing a fraud report of a handwriting expert before the apex court in an SLP. Owing to the fraud report, the apex court had in 2005 quashed the SLP filed by the father of the present petitioner. Since the court was dissatisfied with the reply of the counsel, it sought the permission of the court to withdraw the case.006
- Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case After Ruling that Promise to Marry Was Made In Good FaithSupreme Court Judgment में·August 2, 2022Title: Mandar Deepak Pawar versus the State of Maharashtra Case No.: CrA 442/2022 While quashing a rape case, the Top Court recently observed that there is a difference between a false promise of marriage and a breach of the promise made in good faith but was not subsequently fulfilled. At the outset, the court noted that the parties were in a consensual relationship from 2009-2011 and even though the victim submitted that the relationship was started on a promise to marry, the complaint was only lodged after three years. It is pertinent to note that the Bombay High Court had dismissed the accused’s petition after observing that rape is an offence against society. As per the Apex Court Bench of Justices SK Kaul and MM Sundresh, the registration of FIR, in this case, is an abuse of the criminal process. The court opined that allowing further proceeding in the case would amount to harassment as the parties chose to get into a physical relationship for considerable and for some reason the relationship did not work out, and the same could have happened even after marriage. While referring to Pramod Suryabhan Pawar versus the State of Maharashtra, the court observed that there is a difference between a false promise of marriage given by the maker and a breach of promise which is made in good faith but is not fulfilled. Therefore, the Bench allowed the petition and quashed the rape case filed against the petitioner-accused.0048
- Judge Uttam Anand Murder | Court Sentenced to Life Imprisonment to Both ConvictsGeneral & Legal Discussion में·August 6, 2022A special court in Jharkhand's Dhanbad on Saturday awarded life imprisonment to both the convicts in the murder of Dhanbad Additional District and Sessions Judge Uttam Anand. Last week, a district and additional sessions judge convicted Lakhan Kumar Verma and Rahul Kumar Verma of offenses under sections 302 (murder) and 201 (missing evidence) of the Indian Penal Code as well as sections 34 (common intention). On Saturday, the court heard the arguments for the sentencing before the sentencing. On July 28 last year, Judge Uttam Anand was out for a morning walk when an auto rickshaw hit him. He was seriously injured and died as a result of his injuries. Although it was initially thought to be an accident, CCTV footage of the incident showed that the vehicle was deliberately rammed into the judge as he was driving on the side of the road.002
- Senior Advocate R Venkataramani Appointed as Next Attorney General of IndiaSupreme Court Judgment में·September 29, 2022On Wednesday Ministry of Law and Justice issued a notification about appointment of Attorney General of India. The Notification states: Honorable President is pleased to appoint Shri R. Venkataramani, Senior Advocate as Attorney General for India w.e.f. 1st October 2022. Mr. Venkatramani is a Supreme Court lawyer who has been practising for 45 years. In July 1977, he was admitted to the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, and in 1979, he joined the chambers of Mr. P.P. Rao, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court. In 1982, he established an independent practise in the Supreme Court. In 1997, the Supreme Court of India appointed him as Senior Advocate. Appointed to the Law Commission of India in 2010, and reappointed for a second term in 2013. He has practised in many areas of law, including constitutional law, arbitration law, indirect tax law, corporate and securities law, environmental law, education law, land law, criminal law, human rights law, consumer law, and service law. Mr Venkatramani has appeared in the Supreme Court and High Courts on behalf of several state governments, universities, and central and state public sector undertakings. Between 2004 and 2010, he was a Special Senior Counsel for various departments of the Government of India in the Supreme Court and High Courts, and he also acted as Counsel for the Supreme Court in matters pertaining to the service conditions of Court employees. He has been actively involved in academic activities since 1988, beginning with his association with the National Law School of India University in Bangalore, and is currently involved in academic activities at several law schools.007
- Delhi HC recognises copyright of Satyajit Ray in screenplay written for film 'Nayak'General & Legal Discussion में·May 24, 2023The Delhi High Court on Tuesday recognised the copyright held by Indian cinema legend Satyajit Ray to the screenplay written by him for his film “Nayak”. Justice C Hari Shankar rejected an assertion by the family of film’s producer RD Bansal that the copyright to the film as well as the screenplay belonged to them, and said they have no right to injunct the “novelization of the screenplay” by third parties on the basis of a licence granted by Satyajit Ray’s son Sandip Ray and the Society for Preservation of Satyajit Ray Archives (SPSRA). The plaintiff family, in its lawsuit, said Satyajit Ray was commissioned by RD Bansal to write the screenplay of and to direct the film ‘Nayak’ and the “novelization of the screenplay” by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay and its publication by the defendant HarperCollins Publishers India was contrary to the Copyrights Act. The court said being the author, Ray was the first owner of the copyright to the screenplay and the right to novelise it is also vested in him and the later conferment of this right by his son and SPSRA on the third party was “wholly in order”. “Inexorably, the conclusion is that under Section 17 of the Copyright Act, Satyajit Ray, as the author of the screenplay of the film Nayak, was the first owner of the copyright.. The contention that plaintiff is the owner of the copyright in the screenplay in the film Nayak, therefore, cannot be accepted and is accordingly, rejected,” said the court. “Copyright in the screenplay of the film ‘Nayak’ vested, therefore, consequent on the demise of Satyajit Ray, on his son Sandip Ray and the SPSRA. The conferment of the right to novelize the screenplay, by Sandip Ray and the SPSRA on the defendant, therefore, is wholly in order,” ruled the court. The court observed there is no dispute that the screenplay of the film was “entirely the work of Satyajit Ray” and the producer “has contributed no part”.003
- पत्नी का पति को कायर और बेरोजगार कहना और माता-पिता से अलग होने के लिए मजबूर करना क्रूरता है: कलकत्ताHigh Court Judgment में·April 12, 2023पत्नी का पति को कायर और बेरोजगार कहना और माता-पिता से अलग होने के लिए मजबूर करना क्रूरता है: कलकत्ता हाईकोर्ट ने हाल ही में कहा कि एक पति को मानसिक क्रूरता के लिए अपनी पत्नी से तलाक दिया जा सकता है यदि वह उसे अपने माता-पिता से अलग होने के लिए मजबूर करती है और उसे ‘कायर और बेरोजगार’ भी कहती है।न्यायमूर्ति सौमेन सेन और न्यायमूर्ति उदय कुमार की पीठ ने कहा कि एक भारतीय परिवार में एक बेटे के लिए शादी के बाद भी अपने माता-पिता के साथ रहना एक आम प्रथा है, और अगर उसका पति उसे अपने माता-पिता से अलग करने का प्रयास करता है, तो एक न्यायसंगत होना चाहिए। ऐसा करने का कारण।पीठ ने कहा कि छोटे घरेलू मुद्दों और वित्तीय आवश्यकताओं को पूरा करने से संबंधित चुनौतियों पर अहंकार के टकराव के अलावा, पत्नी द्वारा अपने पति को अपने परिवार से अलग होने का अनुरोध करने के लिए अनुचित कारण थे। पति अपनी एकमात्र वैवाहिक शांति के लिए अपने माता-पिता के घर से बाहर चला गया और किराए के मकान में रहने लगा।अदालत ने कहा कि पत्नी का अपने पति को उसके परिवार से अलग करने का लगातार प्रयास उसके लिए यातनापूर्ण होगा।क्रूरता के आधार पर पति को तलाक देने के अदालत के आदेश को चुनौती देने वाली पत्नी की याचिका पर सुनवाई के बाद पीठ ने इसे खारिज कर दिया।001
- POCSO: Can POCSO case be canceled due to agreement between accused and victim, Supreme Court.Supreme Court Judgment में·October 8, 2022POCSO: Can POCSO case be canceled due to agreement between accused and victim, Supreme Court agrees on investigation The Supreme Court has agreed to examine a legal question whether cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses (POCSO) Act can be quashed on the basis of an agreement between the accused and the victim. A bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and AS Oka stayed the order of the Kerala High Court dated August 26, 2019, quashing the FIR lodged against the accused under the POCSO Act, 2012 on the basis of an agreement reached between the accused and the aggrieved parties. did. The apex court issued a notice on the appeal filed by the Kerala government against the order of the High Court. In this case, the accused, a teacher by profession, was booked under sections of the POCSO Act and the case pertained to sexual assault on a child in that institution by an educational institution or religious institution. The counsel for the petitioners informed that the FIR for offenses punishable under sections 9 (f) and 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012 at Malappuram police station has been quashed, the apex court said. It is not acceptable in view of the Court's decision to do so on the basis of the agreement being reached between the parties.0018
- S. 18 (3) JJ Act | Magistrate has No Power to Retain the File After Declaring the Accused as ...High Court Judgment में·May 26, 2023The AllahabadS. 18 (3) JJ Act | Magistrate has No Power to Retain the File After Declaring the Accused as Juvenile: Allahabad HC HC on Wednesday stated that the magistrate has no power to retain the file after declaring the accused as juvenile. The bench of Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav was dealing with the application filed to quash the impugned order passed by ACJM, Khurja, District Bulandshahar in connection with Criminal Case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC. In this case, the opposite party no.2 lodged the FIR against unknown persons alleging that on false promise of obtaining NOC from Pollution Board, U.P. to run his cold storage, the informant/opposite party no.2 was duped of Rs.40 lakh by unknown person, who asked him to make deposit the said amount into some bank account, where after the OSD of Chief Minister was promised to help him. The informant/opposite party no.2 issued three cheques. Total Rs. 40 lakh has been deposited by the informant/opposite party no.2. When the informant/opposite party no.2 has inquired about the said account, it was found that the said account is opened in the name of Narendra Singh s/o Anil Singh. Since then the informant/opposite party no.2 has contacted several times but the accused person has not responded. High Court looked into Sections 18 (3) and 19 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and observed that as per terms of Section 18 (3) of the Act, 2015, the Magistrate has no power to retain the file after declaring the applicant-accused as juvenile and the trial of any accused/delinquent juvenile, who is assessed to be tried as an adult, can only be held before the Children’s Court/ POCSO Court in terms of Section 18 (3) of the Act, 2015. The bench stated that the accused-applicant was 16 years 9 months and 7 days at the time of the commission of 5 of 7 alleged offence, hence, the accused-applicant was declared juvenile vide order dated 18.05.2022 passed by Juvenile Justice Board. After declaring the accused applicant a juvenile, the Principal Magistrate has rightly requested the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate to pass appropriate order for sending the matter to the Juvenile Justice Board/Children’s court, but the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate without giving any heed, rejected the same observing that as the file of the instant case has been transferred to his court, therefore, he will continue to hold the trial proceeding.002
- Woman approaches Delhi HC to stop friend from going abroad for euthanasiaHigh Court Judgment में·August 12, 2022A plea has been filed in the High Court of Delhi by a woman who wants to stop her friend who is diagnosed with Chronic Fatigue System from going to Europe for Euthanasia. She sought the court’s direction to the Centre to not give emigration clearance to her friend. The petitioner stated that his friend has made false statements to Indian and Foreign authorities to get travel clearance. The Petitioner also seeks direction to the Centre to form a Medical Board to examine his friend’s condition. As per the petitioner, Chronic Fatigue Syndrom is a complex and long-term neuroinflammatory disease which is a poorly understood condition and the research for the disease is in early stages. The petitioner submitted that his friend travelled to Zurich, Switzerland for Euthanasia through an organisation called Dignitas that provides physician-assisted suicide. The petitioner said that the friend in question has already travelled to Zurich for his psychological evaluation and is now awaiting the final decision from the organisation. The petitioner requested the court’s assistance as his friend has become adamant and wants to go for Euthanasia while his old parents still hope that their child will get betterment treatment and his condition would improve. Title: Sindhu MK versus Union of India & Ors001
- President appoints Justice UU Lalit as 49th Chief Justice of IndiaSupreme Court Judgment में·August 11, 2022President appoints Justice UU Lalit as 49th Chief Justice of India On Wednesday, the Ministry of Law and Justice notified the appointment of Justice Uday Umesh Lalit as the 49th Chief Justice of India. The notification states: In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (2) of Article 124 of the Constitution of India, the President, Shri Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, is pleased to appoint a Judge of the Supreme Court as the Chief Justice of India with effect from 27 August 2022. About Justice UU Lalita Justice Lalit was born on 9 November 1957. In June 1983, he was enrolled as a lawyer. Till December 1985, he practiced at the High Court of Bombay. In January 1986, he shifted his practice to Delhi. The Supreme Court appointed him as Senior Advocate in April 2004. Under the directions of the Supreme Court, a Special Public Prosecutor was appointed for the CBI to conduct trials in all 2G cases. For two terms, he served on the Supreme Court of India's Legal Services Committee. On 13 August 2014, he was appointed to the Supreme Court of India.He will retire on 8 November 2022.002
- Daughter who repeatedly demanded money from father can't be prosecuted for abetment to suicide, HCHigh Court Judgment में·September 27, 2022Title: Lata Pramod Dangre vs State of Maharashtra Case No.: CRL WP No.: 866 of 2021 Daughter cannot be prosecuted for abetment to suicide for continuously demanding money from father: HC The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) has ruled that the daughter's repeated pecuniary demands from her father will not attract the offense of abetment to suicide. A bench of Justices Manish Pitale and Govind Sanpalik made the remarks while hearing a plea by a woman who was booked for allegedly abetting her father's suicide. The woman was accused of repeatedly demanding money from her father and mother. The woman is the daughter of the second wife of the deceased. The deceased father committed suicide in September 2021 and in the suicide note he said that his daughter and second wife were harassing him mentally and demanding money. The note also mentions an incident where the deceased invested Rs 2 lakh as a fixed deposit for his second wife but the petitioner forced him to increase the amount to Rs 5 lakh. Even though he managed to increase the amount to Rs 5 lakh, it was then increased to Rs 15 lakh. Initially, the court observed that the suicide note shows the anguish of the deceased on being harassed by the petitioner and his second wife, but also shows that at best, the second wife of the deceased was demanding money at the instance of the petitioner and was asking for their share in agricultural land. The court also noted that the informant in the case is the son-in-law of the deceased who had married the daughter of the first wife of the deceased. It was also noted that the suicide note was written five days before the deceased took the extreme step. According to the court, in such cases, the court is also required to consider the surrounding circumstances, which may affect the deceased to take extreme steps. In this context, the court observed that there is no close link between the suicide note and the deceased committing suicide. Therefore, the court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR lodged against the petitioner.003
- Patient Loses Voice After Surgery: NCDRC Holds AIIMS Doctor Guilty of Medical NegligenceHigh Court Judgment में·December 31, 2022Recently, the NCDRC held an AIIMS doctor guilty of medical negligence as the patient loses voice after the surgery. The bench of Justices S.M. Kantikar and Binoy Kumar stated that “the operative procedure adopted by the doctor and hospital was an accepted reasonable standard of practice, but not having proper informed consent, amounts to negligence per se.” In this case, the Complainant was examined in AIIMS by Dr. Arvind Kumar (OP No.2) and surgery was advised for the ‘Anterior Mediastinum Tumor’. The doctor and his team performed surgery Median ‘Sternotomy’ and ‘Thymectomy’. After the operation, the Complainant was told by the doctor (OP No. 2) that he had to cut his left Phrenic Nerve as the same was passing through the Tthymaic mass and there was no other option left to remove the thymas mass. The consequence of cutting off the left Phrenic Nerve was that his left diaphragm was raised and exists like this till date. As soon as the Complainant regained consciousness he realized that he was not able to speak and informed the doctor. He took it very lightly. The Complainant went to the ENT Department (AIIMS) to get himself examined for the problem of voice suffered by him. After examination, the ENT Department of AIIMS declared left cord palsy (post-operative) and suggested the Complainant for speech Therapy. Dr. Arvind OP No. 2 based on the HPE report advised radiotherapy as a proper treatment, but Complainant did not show any improvement in his voice or movement of the left vocal cord. Being aggrieved the Complainant filed complaint before the State Commission and claimed an amount of Rs. 65,25,000/- as compensation from the OPs. The State Commission allowed the complaint. The issue for consideration before the bench was: Whether the hospital and doctor are liable for negligence or not? The Commission noted that due to achieving complete tumour excision the ipsilateral phrenic nerve was chosen by the OP-2. It is an accepted mode of treatment. It was not proper by leaving part of the tumour, as it would have endangered the patient’s life in future. Thus, it was due diligence that the doctor (OP-2) exercised the care during the entire procedure.009
- वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता बनाने की प्रक्रिया हर साल की जानी चाहिए, व्यक्तिगत साक्षात्कार समग्र मूल्यांकन .....Hindi law में·May 15, 2023वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता बनाने की प्रक्रिया हर साल की जानी चाहिए, व्यक्तिगत साक्षात्कार समग्र मूल्यांकन की अनुमति देता है: सुप्रीम कोर्ट शुक्रवार को सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट और हाईकोर्ट में वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ताओं के पदनाम की व्यवस्था में सुधार पर विस्तृत फैसला सुनाया। जस्टिस एसके कौल, जस्टिस अहसानुद्दीन अमानुल्लाह और जस्टिस अरविंद कुमार की खंडपीठ ने सुश्री इंदिरा जय सिंह बनाम सुप्रीम कोर्ट ऑफ इंडिया (एम.ए. संख्या 709/2022, 1502/2020) के मामले में फैसला सुनाया। सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने पदनाम के विभिन्न पहलुओं को कवर किया है जैसे कि गुप्त मतदान द्वारा मतदान, कट ऑफ मार्क्स, प्रकाशन के लिए अंक, रिपोर्ट किए गए और अप्रतिबंधित निर्णय, निशुल्क कार्य, कानून की विभिन्न शाखाओं के तहत एक आवेदक की डोमेन विशेषज्ञता, आयु, व्यक्तिगत साक्षात्कार और अन्य सामान्य पहलू। पृष्ठभूमि भारत में वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ताओं का पदनाम असाधारण अधिवक्ताओं को दिया जाने वाला एक प्रतिष्ठित खिताब है, जिन्होंने कानूनी पेशे में महत्वपूर्ण योगदान दिया है। यह शीर्षक एक अधिवक्ता के क्षेत्र में खड़े होने और उपलब्धियों की पहचान के लिए दिया जाता है, जो उन्हें ऐसे व्यक्ति के रूप में अलग करता है जो ग्राहकों, न्यायपालिका और जनता को असाधारण सेवा प्रदान कर सकता है। वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ताओं को नामित करने की प्रणाली को चुनौती दी गई थी, जब सुश्री इंदिरा जयसिंह, जो स्वयं एक वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता थीं, ने 2015 में एक रिट याचिका दायर की थी।इस चुनौती के जवाब में, सुप्रीम कोर्ट की तीन-न्यायाधीशों की पीठ ने 12 अक्टूबर, 2017 को एक विस्तृत निर्णय जारी किया। व्यक्तिगत साक्षात्कार अधिवक्ताओं के व्यक्तिगत साक्षात्कार पर, यह प्रस्तुत किया गया था कि यह बड़ी संख्या में उम्मीदवारों के साक्षात्कार के व्यावहारिक मुद्दे को ध्यान में रखते हुए पदनाम की प्रक्रिया में देरी करेगा। इसके अलावा, एक साक्षात्कार से बहुत कम उद्देश्य पूरा होगा क्योंकि उम्मीदवारों का पहले से ही न्यायालय के समक्ष उनकी उपस्थिति से मूल्यांकन किया जा रहा था। खंडपीठ ने कहा: हम उपरोक्त आलोचनाओं से अवगत हैं। हमारा मानना है कि एक साक्षात्कार प्रक्रिया उम्मीदवार की अधिक व्यक्तिगत और गहन परीक्षा की अनुमति देगी। एक साक्षात्कार अधिक समग्र मूल्यांकन को भी सक्षम बनाता है, विशेष रूप से वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता पदनाम असाधारण अधिवक्ताओं को दिया जाने वाला सम्मान है। एक वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता को एक निश्चित समय सीमा के भीतर बहुत स्पष्ट और सटीक होने की भी आवश्यकता होती है, जो ऐसे मूल्य हैं जिनका साक्षात्कार के दौरान आसानी से मूल्यांकन किया जा सकता है। इसी भावना से हमने साक्षात्कार प्रक्रिया को अधिक व्यावहारिक बनाने का प्रयास किया है। इस प्रकार, हमने एक निश्चित समय पर नामित किए जाने वाले वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ताओं की संख्या को ध्यान में रखते हुए साक्षात्कार की संख्या को स्थायी समिति द्वारा व्यवहार्य समझी गई उचित मात्रा तक सीमित कर दिया है। जैसा कि हमने नामित किए जाने वाले उम्मीदवारों की संख्या के संदर्भ में साक्षात्कार की संख्या को सीमित करके प्रक्रिया को सुव्यवस्थित किया है, हमारा मानना है कि एक सार्थक अभ्यास किया जा सकता है। इस प्रकार, हम इस श्रेणी के तहत दिए गए अंकों को कम करने या कम करने के लिए इच्छुक नहीं हैं, विशेष रूप से इस अभ्यास को और अधिक सार्थक बनाने के लिए वर्तमान आदेश द्वारा किए गए फाइन-ट्यूनिंग को देखते हुए। पदनाम प्रक्रिया हर साल न्यायालय ने नोट किया: वर्तमान में, 2018 के दिशानिर्देशों के अनुसार, पदनाम की प्रक्रिया वर्ष में दो बार अर्थात प्रत्येक वर्ष जनवरी और जुलाई के महीने में की जानी है। हालांकि, श्रीमती माधवी दीवान, एएसजी ने प्रस्तुत किया कि यदि उपरोक्त विस्तृत रूप में अभ्यास किया जाना है, तो प्रक्रिया को वर्ष में दो बार करना बहुत मुश्किल होगा। इस संबंध में कोर्ट ने कहा कि साल में कम से कम एक बार यह प्रक्रिया पूरी की जाए ताकि आवेदन जमा न हों। न्यायालय ने नोट किया: इस संबंध में, कुछ उच्च न्यायालयों से कुछ परेशान करने वाले उदाहरण सामने आए हैं जहां पदनाम का प्रयोग कई वर्षों से नहीं किया गया है। नतीजतन, मेधावी अधिवक्ता प्रासंगिक समय पर पदनाम के लिए विचार किए जाने के अवसर से चूक जाते हैं।002
- बैंकों से फास्टैग से एकत्रित धन पर ब्याज का भुगतान कि माँग वाली याचिका पर हाईकोर्ट ने केंद्र से.....Hindi law में·May 18, 2023बैंकों से फास्टैग से एकत्रित धन पर ब्याज का भुगतान कि माँग वाली याचिका पर हाईकोर्ट ने केंद्र से जवाब मांगा दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय ने फास्टैग जारी करने और कार्ड पर न्यूनतम शेष राशि की आवश्यकता के साथ बैंक द्वारा एकत्र किए गए धन पर अधिकारियों को ब्याज का भुगतान करने के लिए बैंकों को निर्देश देने की मांग वाली याचिका पर एनएचएआई और केंद्र से जवाब मांगा है। मुख्य न्यायाधीश सतीश चंद्र शर्मा और न्यायमूर्ति सुब्रमण्यम प्रसाद की पीठ ने भारतीय राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग प्राधिकरण (NHAI) और सड़क परिवहन और राजमार्ग मंत्रालय (MoRT&H) को एक आवेदन पर नोटिस जारी किया, जिसमें कहा गया है कि FASTag जारी करने से हजारों करोड़ रुपये का नुकसान होता है। कम्यूटर समुदाय या एनएचएआई या एमओआरटीएंडएच को बिना किसी समान लाभ के बैंकिंग प्रणाली में रुपये का प्रवेश हुआ है। अदालत ने अधिकारियों को आवेदन पर अपना जवाब दाखिल करने के लिए चार सप्ताह का समय दिया और मामले को 10 अगस्त को आगे की सुनवाई के लिए सूचीबद्ध किया। आवेदन एक लंबित याचिका में दायर किया गया था जो उस नियम को चुनौती देता है जो बिना फास्टैग वाले वाहनों को टोल टैक्स का दोगुना भुगतान करने के लिए मजबूर करता है। याचिका में कहा गया है कि यह नियम भेदभावपूर्ण, मनमाना और जनहित के खिलाफ है क्योंकि यह एनएचएआई को नकद भुगतान करने पर दोगुनी दर से टोल वसूलने का अधिकार देता है। याचिकाकर्ता रविंदर त्यागी का प्रतिनिधित्व अधिवक्ता प्रवीण अग्रवाल ने किया, उन्होंने आवेदन में कहा कि फास्टैग सुविधा की शुरुआत के साथ 30,000 करोड़ रुपये से अधिक की राशि बैंकिंग प्रणाली में आ गई है। याचिका में कहा गया है कि अगर इस आंकड़े पर 8.25 प्रतिशत सालाना की सावधि जमा दर लागू की जाती है, तो हर साल NHAI या MoRT&H को 2,000 करोड़ रुपये से अधिक का लाभ होगा। “वर्तमान में इस पैसे का उपयोग बैंकों/वित्तीय संस्थानों द्वारा नि: शुल्क और उत्तरदाताओं (NHAI और MoRT&H) की कीमत पर किया जा रहा है। इस पैसे का ब्याज या तो NHAI/MoRTH या यात्रियों का है और इसे इसमें खर्च किया जाना चाहिए। सड़क/राजमार्ग/यात्रियों के लाभ के आगे के विकास,” यह कहा। आवेदन में फास्टैग के ब्याज से प्राप्त आय से ‘यात्री कल्याण कोष’ के नाम से एक अलग कोष बनाने के लिए अधिकारियों को निर्देश देने की भी मांग की गई है।002
- What is Sova Malware/Virus?cyber crime में·September 29, 2022SOVA was earlier focusing on countries like US, Russia, and Spain, but in July 2022 it added several other countries including India to its list of targets. The new mobile banking 'Trojan' virus - SOVA - that can secretly encrypt an Android phone for ransom and is difficult to uninstall, is targeting Indian customers. India's federal cyber security agency issued an advisory saying that the virus has upgraded to its fifth version after it was first detected in Indian cyberspace in July."It has been reported to CERT-In that Indian banking customers are being targeted by a new type of mobile banking malware campaign using SOVA Android Trojan. The first version of this malware appeared for sale in underground markets in September 2021 with the ability to harvest user names and passwords via keylogging, stealing cookies, and adding false overlays to a range of apps," the advisory said. Here's all you need to know about the SOVA virus SOVA can add false overlays to a range of apps and "mimic" over 200 banking and payment applications in order to con the Android user The latest version of this malware hides within fake Android applications that show up with the logo of a few famous legitimate apps like Chrome, Amazon, NFT (non-fungible token linked to cryptocurrency) platform to deceive users into installing them. The Indian Computer Emergency Response Team or CERT-In is the federal technology arm to combat cyber attacks and guards the Internet space against phishing and hacking assaults and similar online attacks. The agency said the malware is distributed via smishing (phishing via SMS) attacks, like most Android banking Trojans. The lethality of the virus can be gauged from the fact that it can collect keystrokes, steal cookies, intercept multi-factor authentication (MFA) tokens, take screenshots and record video from a webcam and can perform gestures like screen click, swipe etc. using android accessibility service. Another key feature of the virus, according to the advisory, is the refactoring of its "protections" module, which aims to protect itself from different victim actions. For example, it said, if the user tries to uninstall the malware from the settings or pressing the icon, SOVA is able to intercept these actions and prevent them by returning to the home screen and showing a toast (small popup) displaying "This app is secured". It can jeopardize the privacy and security of sensitive customer data and result in "large-scale" attacks and financial frauds. How does it work As per the advisory, once the fake android application is installed on the phone, it sends the list of all applications installed on the device to the C2 (command and control server) controlled by the threat actor in order to obtain the list of targeted applications. "At this point, the C2 sends back to the malware the list of addresses for each targeted application and stores this information inside an XML file. These targeted applications are then managed through the communications between the malware and the C2," it said. How to protect your Android devce: The CERT-In suggested some counter-measures and best practices that can be put into action by the users to keep safe from the virus. Users should reduce the risk of downloading potentially harmful apps by limiting their download sources to official app stores, such as your device's manufacturer or operating system app store, they should always review the app details, number of downloads, user reviews, comments and "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION" section, it said. One should also verify app permissions and grant only those which have relevant context for the app's purpose. They should install regular Android updates and patches and not browse un-trusted websites or follow un-trusted links and exercise caution while clicking on the link provided in any unsolicited emails and SMSs.001
- एयर इंडिया के सह-यात्री पर पेशाब करने वाले शंकर मिश्रा को अदालत ने 14 दिन कि न्यायिक हिरासत में भेजाHindi law में·January 9, 2023पिछले साल नवंबर में न्यूयॉर्क से दिल्ली आ रही एयर इंडिया की एक फ्लाइट में एक साथी महिला यात्री पर कथित तौर पर पेशाब करने के आरोप में गिरफ्तार शंकर मिश्रा को दिल्ली की एक अदालत ने शनिवार को 14 दिन कि न्यायिक हिरासत में भेज दिया।दिल्ली की पटियाला हाउस कोर्ट की मेट्रोपॉलिटन मजिस्ट्रेट अनामिका ने कहा कि जनता के दबाव को जांच को प्रभावित नहीं करना चाहिए और मिश्रा की पुलिस हिरासत की आवश्यकता नहीं होगी।मिश्रा को दिल्ली पुलिस ने शुक्रवार रात बेंगलुरू में नवंबर में एयर इंडिया के विमान में शराब के नशे में 70 वर्षीय एक महिला पर पेशाब करने के आरोप में गिरफ्तार किया था।टाटा ग्रुप के चेयरमैन को महिला का पत्र मीडिया में प्रकाशित होने के बाद यह घटना सार्वजनिक हुई।वेल्स फ़ार्गो में काम करने वाले मिश्रा को भी कंपनी ने यह कहने के बाद नौकरी से जाने दिया कि उनके खिलाफ लगाए गए आरोप “बेहद परेशान करने वाले” थे।मिश्रा के वकीलों ने हाल ही में एक बयान जारी कर कहा कि उन्होंने 28 नवंबर को महिला को मुआवजे की राशि का भुगतान किया था, लेकिन महिला की बेटी द्वारा लगभग एक महीने बाद 19 दिसंबर को उन्हें पैसे वापस कर दिए गए थे।कल बेंगलुरु में गिरफ्तारी के बाद मिश्रा को दिल्ली लाया गया था। लोक अभियोजक (पीपी) के अनुसार, मिश्रा ने जांच में सहयोग नहीं किया।हालांकि, न्यायाधीश ने कहा कि चालक दल के सदस्यों और अन्य गवाहों से पूछताछ के लिए मिश्रा को हिरासत में लेने की आवश्यकता नहीं होगी।मिश्रा के वकील, अधिवक्ता मनु शर्मा ने कहा कि उनके खिलाफ लगाए गए आरोपों में से केवल एक ही गैर-जमानती है।पीड़िता के वकील के मुताबिक, जिस फ्लाइट में यह घटना हुई, उसके क्रू मेंबर्स भी इसके लिए जिम्मेदार हैं।पक्षों को सुनने के बाद, अदालत ने पुलिस हिरासत के दिल्ली पुलिस के अनुरोध को अस्वीकार कर दिया और इसके बजाय मिश्रा को 14 दिनों के लिए पुलिस हिरासत में भेज दिया।मिश्रा ने भी अलग से जमानत याचिका दायर की और कोर्ट ने दिल्ली पुलिस को नोटिस जारी किया। 11 जनवरी को जमानत याचिका पर सुनवाई होगी।001
- कस्टडी ऑर्डर स्थाई नहीं, जीवन के विभिन्न चरणों में बच्चे की जरूरतों को ध्यान में रखते हुए इसे बदला जHindi law में·May 7, 2023बॉम्बे हाई कोर्ट ने कहा कि हिरासत के आदेश को स्थाई नहीं बनाया जा सकता है और जीवन के विभिन्न चरणों में बच्चे की जरूरतों और कल्याण को ध्यान में रखते हुए इसे बदला जा सकता है। न्यायमूर्ति नीला गोखले की एकल पीठ ने 4 मई के आदेश में कहा कि बच्चों की अभिरक्षा के मामले संवेदनशील मुद्दे हैं जिनके लिए जीवन के बढ़ते चरणों में बच्चे की देखभाल और स्नेह की प्रकृति की सराहना और विचार की आवश्यकता होती है। यह आदेश 40 वर्षीय व्यक्ति द्वारा दायर एक याचिका में पारित किया गया था, जिसमें फैमिली कोर्ट द्वारा पारित एक आदेश को चुनौती दी गई थी, जिसमें हिंदू विवाह अधिनियम के तहत दायर उसके आवेदन को खारिज कर दिया गया था, जिसमें नाबालिग लड़के की संयुक्त हिरासत दोनों माता-पिता को देने के पहले के आदेश में संशोधन की मांग की गई थी। शख्स के मुताबिक, 2017 में तलाक की कार्यवाही में दाखिल सहमति की शर्तों में उसने और उसकी पूर्व पत्नी ने इस बात पर सहमति जताई थी कि अगर दोनों में से एक ने दोबारा शादी की तो दूसरे को बच्चे की पूरी कस्टडी मिलेगी. फैमिली कोर्ट ने इस आधार पर आदमी के आवेदन को खारिज कर दिया था कि उसे अभिभावक और वार्ड अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के तहत दायर करना चाहिए था न कि हिंदू विवाह अधिनियम के तहत।व्यक्ति ने अपनी दलील में कहा कि वह केवल तलाक की कार्यवाही में दायर सहमति शर्तों में संशोधन की मांग कर रहा था। उच्च न्यायालय ने पारिवारिक अदालत के आदेश को रद्द कर दिया और नाबालिग बच्चे की हिरासत से संबंधित सहमति शर्तों में संशोधन की मांग करने वाले व्यक्ति के आवेदन पर नए सिरे से सुनवाई करने का निर्देश दिया।001
- RBI Will Withdraw ₹2000 Currency Notes from Circulation- It Will Remain Legal Tender Till Sep 3General & Legal Discussion में·May 20, 2023BIG: RBI Will Withdraw ₹2000 Currency Notes from Circulation- It Will Remain Legal Tender Till Sep 30 The Reserve Bank of India today made a big announannounced that it will withdraw ₹2000 notes from circulation. However, the currency will continue as Legal Tender. According to a press release published today by the Chief General Manager of the RBI, the purpose of releasing the 2000 banknotes was to satisfy the economy’s need for cash at the time. It stated that after banknotes in other denominations were made accessible in sufficient numbers, this objective was achieved, and as a result, the printing of 2000 banknotes was discontinued in 2018–19. “In view of the above, and in pursuance of the “Clean Note Policy” of the Reserve Bank of India, it has been decided to withdraw the ₹2000 denomination banknotes from circulation.“ In November 2016, the ₹2000 denomination banknote was launched in accordance with Section 24(1) of the RBI Act, 1934, principally to swiftly address the economy’s need for cash following the withdrawal of the legal tender status of the 500 and 1000 banknotes in use at the time. “Once banknotes in other denominations became available in sufficient quantities, the objective of introducing 2000 banknotes was met,” RBI stated in a statement. As a result, the printing of ₹2000 banknotes was discontinued in 2018–19.A little over 89% of the banknotes in the denomination of 2000 were printed before March 2017 and are nearing the end of their 4-5 year expected lifespan. The total value of these banknotes in circulation has decreased from its peak of 6.73 lakh crore as of March 31, 2018 (37.3% of Notes in Circulation) to its lowest point of 3.62 lakh crore as of March 31, 2023, which represents only 10.8% of Notes in Circulation. Additionally, it has been noted that transactions involving this denomination are uncommon. Additionally, the supply of banknotes in other denominations is still sufficient to meet the public’s demand for currency. In light of the foregoing and in accordance with the Reserve Bank of India’s “Clean Note Policy,” it has been decided to stop issuing banknotes with the denomination of ₹2000. The ₹2000-denomination bills will still be accepted as legal money. It should be noted that the RBI removed comparable notes from circulation in 2013–2014. Therefore, customers can deposit ₹2000 notes into their accounts or exchange them for bills of other denominations at any bank branch. Deposits into bank accounts may be done normally, that is, without limits and according to current directives and other relevant legal constraints, according to a statement from the RBI. Starting on May 23, 2023, any bank will allow the exchange of 2000 rupee notes into notes of other denominations up to a limit of 20,000 rupees at a time in order to maintain operational convenience and prevent disrupting the routine operations of bank branches.002
- आरबीआई ने दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट में 2000 रुपये के नोट बिना पहचान पत्र के बदलने ने निर्णय को कहा सहीHindi law में·May 24, 2023ये नोटबंदी नहीं- आरबीआई ने दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट में 2000 रुपये के नोट बिना पहचान पत्र के बदलने ने निर्णय को कहा सही भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक (RBI) ने मंगलवार को दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट को बताया कि 2000 रुपये के नोटों को वापस लेना विमुद्रीकरण नहीं बल्कि एक वैधानिक अभ्यास है, और उनके विनिमय को सक्षम करने का निर्णय परिचालन सुविधा के लिए लिया गया था। अदालत वकील अश्विनी कुमार उपाध्याय की याचिका पर सुनवाई कर रही थी कि आरबीआई और एसबीआई द्वारा 2000 रुपये के बैंक नोटों को बिना प्रमाण के बदलने की अधिसूचना मनमाना और भ्रष्टाचार पर अंकुश लगाने के लिए बनाए गए कानूनों के खिलाफ है। मुख्य न्यायाधीश सतीश चंद्र शर्मा और न्यायमूर्ति सुब्रमण्यम प्रसाद की पीठ ने कहा कि वह वकील द्वारा जनहित याचिका पर उचित आदेश पारित करेगी। अदालत ने कहा, “हम इस पर गौर करेंगे। हम उचित आदेश पारित करेंगे।” उपाध्याय ने स्पष्ट किया कि वह 2000 रुपये के बैंक नोट वापस लेने के फैसले को चुनौती नहीं दे रहे थे, लेकिन बिना किसी पर्ची या पहचान प्रमाण के नोट बदलने की बात कर रहे थे। उन्होंने जोर देकर कहा कि बैंक खाते में जमा के माध्यम से 2000 रुपये के बैंक नोट के विनिमय की अनुमति दी जानी चाहिए। उपाध्याय ने दावा किया, “आईडी प्रूफ को बाहर क्यों रखा गया है? हर गरीब के पास जन धन खाता है। बीपीएल व्यक्ति भी बैंक खातों से जुड़े हुए हैं।” आरबीआई के लिए वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता पराग पी त्रिपाठी ने जोर देकर कहा कि अदालत ऐसे मामलों में हस्तक्षेप नहीं कर सकती है और परिचालन सुविधा के लिए 2000 रुपये के नोट के विनिमय की अनुमति देने का निर्णय लिया गया था। उन्होंने कहा, “यह नोटबंदी नहीं है। 2000 रुपये के नोट का आमतौर पर इस्तेमाल नहीं किया जाता था। अन्य मूल्यवर्ग मुद्रा आवश्यकताओं को पूरा करना जारी रखते हैं।” त्रिपाठी ने कहा, “यह एक वैधानिक अभ्यास है। याचिकाकर्ता द्वारा दावा किए गए बिंदुओं में से कोई भी संवैधानिक मुद्दों से संबंधित नहीं है।” अदालत ने पक्षों को सुनने के बाद कहा, “तर्क सुने गए। फैसला सुरक्षित रखा गया।” याचिकाकर्ता ने अपनी दलील में तर्क दिया है कि आरबीआई और एसबीआई द्वारा 2000 रुपये के बैंक नोटों को आवश्यक पर्ची और पहचान प्रमाण के बिना बदलने की अधिसूचना मनमाना, तर्कहीन और भारत के संविधान के अनुच्छेद 14 का अपमान करने वाली थी। याचिका में कहा गया है कि बड़ी मात्रा में मुद्रा या तो किसी व्यक्ति के लॉकर में पहुंच गई है या “अलगाववादियों, आतंकवादियों, माओवादियों, ड्रग तस्करों, खनन माफियाओं और भ्रष्ट लोगों द्वारा जमा की गई है”। याचिका में इस बात पर प्रकाश डाला गया है कि उच्च मूल्य की मुद्रा में नकद लेनदेन भ्रष्टाचार का मुख्य स्रोत है और इसका उपयोग आतंकवाद, नक्सलवाद, अलगाववाद, कट्टरपंथ, जुआ, तस्करी, मनी लॉन्ड्रिंग, अपहरण, जबरन वसूली, रिश्वत और दहेज आदि जैसी अवैध गतिविधियों के लिए किया जाता है। आरबीआई और एसबीआई को यह सुनिश्चित करना चाहिए कि 2000 रुपये के नोट संबंधित बैंक खातों में ही जमा किए जाएं। “हाल ही में, केंद्र द्वारा यह घोषणा की गई थी कि प्रत्येक परिवार के पास आधार कार्ड और बैंक खाता होना चाहिए। इसलिए, आरबीआई पहचान प्रमाण प्राप्त किए बिना 2000 रुपये के नोट बदलने की अनुमति क्यों दे रहा है। यह बताना भी आवश्यक है कि 80 करोड़ बीपीएल परिवारों को मुफ्त अनाज मिलता है।” इसका मतलब है कि 80 करोड़ भारतीय शायद ही कभी 2,000 रुपये के नोटों का उपयोग करते हैं। इसलिए, याचिकाकर्ता ने आरबीआई और एसबीआई को यह निर्देश देने की भी मांग की है कि वे यह सुनिश्चित करने के लिए कदम उठाएं कि 2000 रुपये के नोट केवल बैंक खाते में ही जमा किए जाएं। याचिका में कहा गया है कि बैंक खातों में 2000 रुपये के नोट जमा करने से यह सुनिश्चित होगा कि काले धन और आय से अधिक संपत्ति वाले लोगों की आसानी से पहचान की जा सके। 19 मई को, भारतीय रिज़र्व बैंक (RBI) ने प्रचलन से 2,000 रुपये के नोटों को वापस लेने की घोषणा की थी, और कहा कि प्रचलन में मौजूदा नोट या तो बैंक खातों में जमा किए जा सकते हैं या 30 सितंबर तक बदले जा सकते हैं। आरबीआई ने एक बयान में कहा कि 2,000 रुपए के नोट वैध रहेंगे।001
- Murder of a Lawyer | Telangana HCHigh Court Judgment में·August 4, 2022Telangana High Court Takes Cognizance of Bar Association’s Letter Petition, Registers as PIL On Tuesday, the Telangana High Court Advocates’ Association wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of Telangana High Court for taking Suo Motu Congnizance of Brutal Murder of Advocate Sri M Malla Reddy.002
- लोन धोखाधड़ी मामले में ICICIबैंक की पूर्व सीईओ चंदा कोचर और उनके पति को बेल पर रिहा करने का आदेशHindi law में·January 9, 2023बॉम्बे हाई कोर्ट ने लोन धोखाधड़ी मामले में ICICI बैंक की पूर्व सीईओ चंदा कोचर और उनके पति को बेल पर रिहा करने का आदेश दिया अवैध हिरासत का आरोप लगाने वाली एक याचिका के जवाब में, बॉम्बे हाई कोर्ट ने सोमवार को ICICI बैंक की पूर्व सीईओ और एमडी चंदा कोचर और उनके पति दीपक कोचर को बेल रिहा करने का आदेश दिया। कोर्ट ने कहा गिरफ़्तारी धारा 41A CrPC के प्रविधानों के उल्लंघन में है। शुक्रवार को न्यायमूर्ति रेवती मोहिते डेरे और न्यायमूर्ति पृथ्वी राज चव्हाण की खंडपीठ ने याचिका को आदेश के लिए सुरक्षित रख लिया था। दोनों ने दो अलग-अलग याचिकाओं में अदालत में याचिका दायर की, जिसमें 2009 और 2012 के बीच आईसीआईसीआई बैंक द्वारा वेणुगोपाल धूत के वीडियोकॉन ग्रुप को दिए गए ऋण में अनियमितता से जुड़े मामले में सीबीआई की प्राथमिकी और रिमांड आदेश को रद्द करने की मांग की गई थी। उन्होंने अस्थायी रिहाई का अनुरोध किया था। अदालत ने पिछले हफ्ते स्पष्ट किया कि वह कोचर परिवार की याचिकाओं की सुनवाई उनके बेटे की शादी की वजह से नहीं कर रही है, बल्कि सीआरपीसी की धारा 41Aका अनुपालन करने में विफल रहने के कारण कर रही है, जिसके लिए उन्हें नोटिस दिया गया था। चंदा कोचर का प्रतिनिधित्व वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता अमित देसाई ने किया, जबकि उनके पति का प्रतिनिधित्व वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता विक्रम चौधरी ने किया। उन्होंने तर्क दिया कि चूंकि कोचर सीआरपीसी की धारा 41ए(3) के तहत जांच एजेंसी के सामने पेश हुए थे, इसलिए उन्हें गिरफ्तार करना अनावश्यक था। इसके अलावा, उन्होंने शुरू से ही जांचकर्ताओं के साथ सैकड़ों पृष्ठों के दस्तावेज़ उपलब्ध कराने में सहयोग किया था। देसाई ने यह भी दावा किया कि अरेस्ट मेमो पर किसी महिला अधिकारी के हस्ताक्षर नहीं थे। दूसरी ओर, दीपक कोचर को पहले पीएमएलए मामले में प्रवर्तन निदेशालय द्वारा गिरफ्तार किया गया था और बाद में चौधरी के अनुसार अपीलीय प्राधिकरण द्वारा उनकी संपत्ति की कुर्की की पुष्टि करने से इनकार करने के बाद जमानत पर रिहा कर दिया गया था। उनकी याचिका में जनवरी में उनके बेटे की शादी का हवाला देते हुए गिरफ्तारी के समय पर सवाल उठाया गया था। कोचर के इकलौते बेटे की शादी 15 जनवरी को है और उत्सव जल्द ही शुरू होने वाला है। यह इस विश्वास की ओर ले जाता है कि स्थापित कानून के बावजूद प्राथमिकी के 4 साल बाद उसके बेटे की शादी की पूर्व संध्या पर गिरफ्तार किया जाना, दलील के अनुसार दुर्भावना से प्रेरित था। क्या था मामला? सीबीआई ने जनवरी 2018 में दंपति के खिलाफ जांच शुरू की, रिपोर्ट के बाद कि वीडियोकॉन के धूत ने कथित रूप से दीपक और दो रिश्तेदारों के साथ 2012 में आईसीआईसीआई बैंक से 3,250 करोड़ रुपये का ऋण प्राप्त करने के छह महीने बाद एक फर्म का भुगतान किया अनियमितताएं जून 2009 और अक्टूबर 2011 के बीच वीडियोकॉन समूह की पांच कंपनियों को लगभग 1,575 करोड़ रुपये के छह उच्च मूल्य के ऋण देने में शामिल है। एजेंसी के अनुसार, ऋण स्वीकृति समिति के नियमों और नीतियों के उल्लंघन में दिए गए थे। सीबीआई के अनुसार, इन ऋणों को बाद में गैर-निष्पादित संपत्तियों के रूप में वर्गीकृत किया गया, जिसके परिणामस्वरूप आईसीआईसीआई बैंक को गलत नुकसान हुआ और उधारकर्ताओं और आरोपी व्यक्तियों को गलत लाभ हुआ। 26 अप्रैल,001
- Husband said that he has become a monk, yet the Supreme Court refused to accept the petition.SCSupreme Court Judgment में·August 23, 2022The husband said that he has become a monk, yet the Supreme Court refused to accept the petition for divorce? know why Recently, the Supreme Court overturned the divorce of husband and wife who have been living separately for 18 years. On the request of the husband, the High Court granted the divorce. However, the wife refused to get a divorce. She appealed to the Supreme Court, which overturned the divorce decision. The husband had argued for divorce, claiming that he had become a hermit and was no longer involved in household life. According to the Supreme Court, sometimes it becomes more important for a woman to get married. She can live her life with the help of her vermilion even if she is separated from her husband. A bench of Justices UU Lalit and S Ravindra Bhatt also observed that it may be impossible for a couple now living separately for 18 years to reconcile. However, because of the way society treats women and because it is important for the woman herself that she remains married, the couple's divorce is annulled. The woman's husband is a resident of Bhind in Madhya Pradesh. The husband had earlier filed for divorce in the family court. It was claimed that his wife had left him and was living separately from him. The wife was opposing the divorce. In 2008, the family court rejected the divorce application. After that the husband went to the Madhya Pradesh High Court. He filed a petition in the Gwalior Bench for divorce. The High Court had approved the divorce in 2014. Also ordered the husband to give Rs 5 lakh to the wife. The wife appealed against this decision in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court asked the High Court to reconsider its decision in 2017, but the High Court granted divorce for the second time. Thereafter, the Supreme Court heard the matter. The husband's argument for divorce was given on his behalf in the court, which said that he has now become a monk. He has surrendered everything. According to the Supreme Court, if the husband has become a monk, it does not matter whether the marriage is annulled or restored. Further, the bench said that the amount given by the husband to the woman after the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court will not be taken from her.008
- What is Cherry-Picking Principle? Supreme Court ExplainsSupreme Court Judgment में·August 5, 2022Case Title: Reliance Industries Limited v. Securities And Exchange Board Of India & Ors. Bench: CJI. N.V. Ramana and Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Hima Kohli Citation: CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1167 of 2022 The Supreme Court on Friday stated that, SEBI could not have claimed privilege over certain parts of the documents and at the same time, agreeing to disclose some part. Such selective disclosure cannot be countenanced in law as it clearly amounts to cherry-picking. The bench of CJI. N.V. Ramana and Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Hima Kohli stated that “Initiation of criminal action in commercial transactions, should take place with a lot of circumspection and the Courts ought to act as gate keepers for the same.” In this case, A complaint was filed by one Shri S. Gurumurthy, with the SEBI against Reliance Industries Ltd., its associate companies and its directors, alleging that they fraudulently allotted 12 crore equity shares of RIL to entities purportedly connected with the promoters of RIL, which were funded by RIL and other group companies in 1994. It was alleged that the company and its directors were in violation of Section 77 of the Companies Act, 1956. Mr. Harish Salve, Counsel for the appellant submitted that, the challenge to the maintainability of the present appeal is misconceived. He stated that the interim application filed for seeking documents was argued at length before the High Court, which was ultimately not considered. Mr. Arvind Datar, Counsel for the respondents submitted that, present appeal is not maintainable as there is no criminal complaint pending as on this date. The appellant cannot seek documents in a criminal revision against dismissal of the complaint on the ground of limitation. The issue for consideration before the bench were: 1. Whether this appeal is maintainable? 2.Whether SEBI is required to disclose documents in the present set of proceedings? While dealing with the first issue Supreme Court stated that “Initiation of criminal action in commercial transactions, should take place with a lot of circumspection and the Courts ought to act as gate keepers for the same. Initiating frivolous criminal actions against large corporations, would give rise to adverse economic consequences for the country in the long run. Therefore, the Regulator must be cautious in initiating such an action and carefully weigh each factor.” While dealing with the second issue Supreme Court opined that “It is a matter of record that subsequently, the settlement proceedings were terminated by SEBI and thereafter SEBI has decided to initiate a criminal complaint against the appellant herein. In this context, the objection of SEBI that the issue of disclosure of documents is res judicata as the same was disallowed by the High Court in the earlier round of litigation, cannot be sustained in the eyes of law.” Supreme Court found that SEBI could not have claimed privilege over certain parts of the documents and at the same time, agreeing to disclose some part. Such selective disclosure cannot be countenanced in law as it clearly amounts to cherry-picking. In view of the above, The Supreme Court allowed the appeal.0010
- Woman lawyer sent to 14-day judicial custody for abusing security guardsGeneral & Legal Discussion में·August 23, 2022A video went viral on social media on Sunday in which a woman can be seen abusing two security guards and calling a security guard "Bihari" and using other obscene language. Later it was found that the video is from Noida, UP and the woman is a lawyer working in DSK Legal Law Firm. A woman lawyer (Bhavya Roy) has been arrested and kept in judicial custody for 14 days for misbehaving with the security guards at her Noida residential society. Reportedly, Roy, who was intoxicated at the time of the incident, was also seen assaulting the security guards and it was claimed that three girls had filed a complaint against the security guard. According to reports, the woman lawyer has been accused of sections 153, 323 and 504, 506 of the IPC.001
- Pre-enrolment AIBE would be the best: Attorney General K K Venugopal tells: Supreme CourtSupreme Court Judgment में·September 27, 2022Attorney General (AG) of India KK Venugopal argued before a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Tuesday that holding the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) before enrollment would be the most appropriate course of action [Anuj Agarwal v Union of India]. The submission was supported by senior advocate KV Viswanathan before a five-judge bench comprising Justices SK Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, AS Oka, Vikram Nath, and JK Maheshwari. "The Act allows, as it stands now, to frame rules for the pre-enrollment examination. ", the senior counsel informed the court. On the Court's question about the impact of this approach on the judgment in V Sudeer v Bar Council of India, Viswanathan explained that the judgment in the matter was wrong. The pre-enrolment training for those entering the legal profession initiated by the Bar Council of India (BCI) was subject to challenge in this case. The Court had struck down the requirement of such training while observing, "These rules show that an enrolled advocate may practice as a full-fledged advocate, subject to the conditions laid down in these rules. His authority once granted cannot be restricted to his acting in court when he The State remains enrolled as an advocate on the roll. Therefore, it must be held that section 49(1)(ah) cannot uphold the impugned rules." During the hearing, Justice Kaul also recommended that the difficulty level of AIBE should be determined based on the number of advocates enrolled in the country. The judge underlined that the minimum standard required was set before being allowed to enroll and practice in the examination. Therefore, it must be of sufficient quality to determine the ability to practice. "How many lawyers do you need in the system? Ideally, if the job is done fairly, how many lawyers would be needed? Is there a need for such a liberal test?" He asked. He suggested that BCI conduct an analysis in this regard. When the issue of necessary training of young lawyers came to the fore, Viswanathan urged the court to consider training young lawyers. He suggested that this may be prescribed as one of the determining factors for lawyers for designation as seniors or for promotion to the Bench. The hearing will continue tomorrow. The Constitution Bench is hearing petitions challenging the validity of Rule 9 to 11 of the BCI Rules for violation of Sections 16, 24 and 30 of the Advocates Act and Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution. Rule 9 makes clearing AIBE a mandatory pre-condition for every practicing advocate. Rule 10 enables the BCI to conduct examinations and Rule 11 deals with the process of issuing certificates to practice. The questions referred for consideration of the Bench are: (1) Whether pre-enrollment training can be lawfully prescribed by the Bar Council of India in terms of the Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 made under section 24(3)(d) of the Advocates Act, 1961 and if so If so, what is the decision of this Court in V. Sudhir v. Bar Council of India et al. [(1999) 3 SCC 176)] Need to be reconsidered? (2) Can a pre-enrolment examination be prescribed by the Bar Council of India under the Advocates Act, 1961? (3) If questions numbers 1 and 2 are answered in the negative, whether the post-enrolment examination has been validly prescribed by the Bar Council of India in accordance with section 49(1)(ah) of the Advocates Act, 1961?003
- बेंगलुरु जाने वाली फ़लाइट में बीड़ी पीने के आरोप में व्यक्ति गिरफ्तार: कहा 'ट्रेनों में…'General & Legal Discussion में·May 18, 2023बेंगलुरु जाने वाली फ़लाइट में बीड़ी पीने के आरोप में व्यक्ति गिरफ्तार: कहा 'ट्रेनों में…' हाल ही में बेंगलुरू हवाईअड्डे पर पहली बार उड़ान भरने वाले एक यात्री को बीच हवा में बीड़ी पीते हुए पकड़े जाने के बाद गिरफ्तार किया गया था। प्रवीण कुमार के रूप में पहचाने जाने वाले यात्री पर अन्य यात्रियों के जीवन को खतरे में डालने का आरोप लगाया गया था। हालाँकि, उसने पुलिस को बताया कि वह विमानन नियमों से अनभिज्ञ था और उसने सोचा कि यह ट्रेन के वॉशरूम में धूम्रपान करने के समान होगा, जिसे उसने नियमित रूप से करना स्वीकार किया। “मैं अक्सर ट्रेन से यात्रा करता हूं और शौचालय के अंदर धूम्रपान करता हूं।” टाइम्स ऑफ इंडिया के मुताबिक, उसने पुलिस को बताया, “मैंने यह सोचकर बीड़ी पीने का फैसला किया कि मैं यहां भी ऐसा ही कर सकता हूं।” केबिन क्रू द्वारा शौचालय में धूम्रपान करते पकड़े जाने से पहले कुमार मंगलवार को अहमदाबाद में विमान में सवार हुए। अधिकारियों के अनुसार, फ्लाइट अटेंडेंट ने तुरंत प्रतिक्रिया दी और उसे हिरासत में ले लिया। केम्पेगौड़ा अंतरराष्ट्रीय हवाईअड्डे पर पहुंचने पर उन्हें गिरफ्तार कर लिया गया। 1937 के द एयरक्राफ्ट रूल्स के अनुसार, ई-सिगरेट के उपयोग सहित धूम्रपान, भारतीय उड़ानों पर प्रतिबंधित है। हाल के दिनों में, हालांकि, देश भर में कई उल्लंघनों की सूचना मिली है।001
- व्यक्ति ने प्रेमिका के पति से उसकी कस्टडी मांगी- हाई कोर्ट ने लगाया पाँच हज़ार रुपये का जुर्मानाHigh Court Judgment में·March 20, 2023गुजरात हाईकोर्ट ने लिव-इन समझौते के आधार पर अपने पति से अपनी प्रेमिका की कस्टडी मांगने वाले एक व्यक्ति पर 5,000 रुपये का जुर्माना लगाया। यह मामला बनासकांठा जिले का है। उस व्यक्ति ने HC से संपर्क किया और कहा कि वह उस महिला के साथ रिश्ते में था जिसकी कस्टडी वह मांग रहा था। उसे उसकी मर्जी के खिलाफ किसी और से शादी करने के लिए मजबूर किया गया था और यह जोड़ा साथ नहीं मिला। महिला ने अपने पति और ससुराल को छोड़कर उसके साथ रहने लगी। वे साथ रहे और लिव-इन रिलेशनशिप एग्रीमेंट भी साइन किया। कुछ देर बाद महिला के परिजन व ससुराल पहुंचे और उसे उसके पति को लौटा दिया। वह व्यक्ति एचसी गया और अपनी प्रेमिका के लिए बंदी प्रत्यक्षीकरण याचिका दायर की, जिसमें दावा किया गया कि वह अपने पति की अवैध हिरासत में थी और उसकी इच्छा के विरुद्ध आयोजित की जा रही थी। उन्होंने अनुरोध किया कि पुलिस महिला को उसके पति से हिरासत में ले और उसे उसके हवाले कर दे। राज्य सरकार ने याचिका का विरोध करते हुए दावा किया कि इस व्यक्ति के पास याचिका दायर करने का अधिकार नहीं है। यदि महिला अपने पति की हिरासत में है, तो वह अवैध हिरासत में नहीं है।मामले की सुनवाई के बाद जस्टिस वी एम पंचोली और एच एम प्राच्छक की बेंच ने कहा कि याचिकाकर्ता की महिला से शादी अभी तक नहीं हुई है और उसका अपने पति से तलाक भी नहीं हुआ है। “इसलिए हमारी राय है कि प्रतिवादी संख्या 4 (महिला) की प्रतिवादी संख्या 5 (उसके पति) के साथ हिरासत को अवैध हिरासत नहीं कहा जा सकता है, जैसा कि याचिकाकर्ता ने आरोप लगाया है, और याचिकाकर्ता के पास वर्तमान याचिका दायर करने का कोई अधिकार नहीं है।” तथाकथित लिव-इन रिलेशनशिप एग्रीमेंट के आधार पर,” उन्होंने कहा, और याचिकाकर्ता पर 5,000 रुपये का जुर्माना लगाया, उसे राज्य कानूनी सेवा प्राधिकरण के पास पैसा जमा करने का निर्देश दिया।001
- CBI Registers FIR AgainstGang Involved in Lodging of FalseFIRs of Rape and SC-ST Act Against LawyersGeneral & Legal Discussion में·March 26, 2023CBI Registers FIR Against Gang Involved in Lodging of False FIRs of Rape and SC-ST Act Against Lawyers The Special Crime Branch of CBI Lucknow has registered an FIR against the gang which filed false cases of rape and SC-ST Act. The Special Crime Branch of CBI Lucknow has registered 3 cases in this matter on the orders of the Allahabad High Court. This gang was blackmailing people including lawyers in Prayagraj by implicating them in fake cases. On the basis of fake cases related to rape and SC-ST filed by advocate Sunil Kumar in the year 2016, the CBI on Friday registered a case against a woman in Prayagraj’s Mauaima police station in the year 2018, a woman in Daraganj police station in the year 2021 and Shivkuti police station in the year 2016. But new cases have been registered at the CBI police station. The CBI team will soon reach Prayagraj to investigate and conduct a fresh investigation. The blackmailing gang by implicating them in false cases came to light when an alleged victim filed a petition in the High Court seeking an order for speedy disposal of a rape case. In this case, an accused lawyer submitted a list of 51 such cases in the High Court to the High Court. In which people were implicated in rape and SC-ST act. Out of this, 36 cases were registered in Mauv Aima police station alone. How are innocent people implicated? The lawyer told the court that a very vicious gang is active in Prayagraj, which includes some women and lawyers. This gang files fake cases against innocent people through women and then blackmails them demanding huge amount in the name of withdrawing the case. Taking this fact seriously, the High Court had directed the CBI on March 18, 2022 to conduct a preliminary inquiry and submit the report. After this, the CBI registered an FIR after investigating the matter.002
- Verification is necessary after ITR filing, know what is the time limit and methodGeneral & Legal Discussion में·August 26, 2022If you have not verified yourself after filing ITR, then your ITR will be considered incomplete. Earlier, 120 days were available for e-verification, which has now been reduced to 30 days. If you are going to file your ITR ie Income Tax Return this month, then there is an important news for you. Let us tell you that 31 July 2022 was the last date to file ITR. After that you will have to pay a fine of Rs 5000 for filing ITR. ITR can be filed with penalty till 31st December. Apart from this, along with filling ITR, it is also necessary to verify it.003
- Bar Council barred 140 lawyers from practicing on charges of fake enrollment certificates - recommenGeneral & Legal Discussion में·August 11, 2022Recently Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana barred 140 lawyers from practicing/appearing in any court after they were found guilty of "possession of fake and fabricated enrollment certificates". All these people were practicing in the same district of Punjab (Ludhiana) and were appearing in the court. The Bar has termed the case of practicing on the basis of fake Enrollment Certificate (Advocate's License) as a scam and a classic case. The Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana, which included CM Munjal, Chairman Harish Rai Dhanda, member and co-opted member Vikas Bishnoi, has sent a list of such advocates to the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana for immediate action, leading to the conviction of the culprits. to be prosecuted. The Bar's disciplinary committee was disposing of a complaint filed by a Ludhiana-based lawyer David Gill against Parminder Singh, who was enrolled as an advocate, alleging that he did not hold a valid licence. During the hearing, the Disciplinary Committee constituted a three-member internal committee to examine the licenses of all the members of the District Bar Association. The committee comprising Rajesh Kumar, Rahul Grover and Pradeep Sharma presented its report by displaying a chart made by comparing voter lists provided by Bar Association Ludhiana and Bar Council records. After scrutiny of records from 2000 to 2021, it was revealed that a total of 140 advocates of Ludhiana were practicing on non-existent enrollment numbers.004
- क्या आपराधिक मामले में चार्जशीट ऑनलाइन अपलोड की जानी चाहिए? सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने फ़ैसला कियाHindi law में·January 9, 2023क्या आपराधिक मामले में चार्जशीट ऑनलाइन अपलोड की जानी चाहिए? सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने फ़ैसला किया सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने इस सवाल पर अपना आदेश सुरक्षित रख लिया है कि क्या पुलिस और ईडी और सीबीआई जैसी जांच एजेंसियों को सार्वजनिक मंच पर मामलों में दायर चार्जशीट अपलोड करनी चाहिए ताकि जनता उस तक पहुंच सके? एडमिशन स्टेज पर, जस्टिस एमआर शाह और जस्टिस सीटी रविकुमार की खंडपीठ ने इस विचार के बारे में संदेह व्यक्त किया और कहा कि जनता के लिए उपलब्ध चार्जशीट का दुरुपयोग किया जा सकता है। अदालत ने यह भी संदेह जताया कि क्या ईडी को सार्वजनिक मंच पर चार्जशीट अपलोड करने के निर्देश जारी किए जा सकते हैं। याचिकाकर्ताओं की ओर से पेश अधिवक्ता प्रशांत भूषण ने यूथ बार एसोसिएशन इंडिया बनाम यूनियन ऑफ इंडिया में शीर्ष अदालत के 2016 के फैसले पर भरोसा किया, जिसमें यह निर्देश दिया गया था कि जब तक मामला संवेदनशील न हो, एफआईआर की प्रतियां 24 घंटे के भीतर प्रकाशित की जानी चाहिए। श्री भूषण ने आगे तर्क दिया कि चार्जशीट एक सार्वजनिक दस्तावेज है जिसे चार्जशीट दायर करना सार्वजनिक कर्तव्य के निर्वहन में एक सार्वजनिक अधिकारी द्वारा किया गया कार्य है और इसलिए यह साक्ष्य अधिनियम के धारा 74 के तहत सार्वजनिक दस्तावेज की परिभाषा के तहत आएगा। यह भी बताया गया कि RTI अधिनियम की धारा 6(2) के अनुसार, सूचना मांगने के लिए किसी औचित्य या कारण की आवश्यकता नहीं है। दलीलें सुनने के बाद बेंच ने कहा कि वह एक विस्तृत आदेश जारी करेगी। शीर्षक: सौरव दास बनाम भारत संघ केस नंबर डब्ल्यूपी सी 1126002
- Bar Council of Delhi Forms Committee to Draft Advocates Protection ActGeneral & Legal Discussion में·April 12, 2023Bar Council of Delhi Forms Committee to Draft Advocates Protection Act The Bar Council of Delhi has established a special committee to draft the Advocates Protection Act for the safety of lawyers practising in the national capital who are registered with the lawyers’ body. The move comes after recent attacks on lawyers, both inside and outside the courts. The legislation aims to be enacted by the Delhi Government, and the newly-formed Special Committee, led by K.C. Mittal, former Chairman of the Bar Council of Delhi, will draft the comprehensive plan. Other members include D.K. Sharma, Chairman of Executive Committee of BCD; Sanjay Rathi, Hony. Secretary of BCD; Ajayinder Sangwan, Co-Chairman of BCD; and Ajay Sondhi, Co-Chairman of BCD. The Bar Council of India has also proposed a similar legislation to the Government of India. The Bar Council of Delhi has also requested input from all its members and office bearers of the coordination Committee of the district bar associations.006
- Madras High Court orders to arrest fake lawyer - Know the whole matterHigh Court Judgment में·August 7, 2022Recently Madras High Court directed the police to arrest the fake lawyer practicing using a fake LLB degree and asked that the photo of this person should be printed in the newspapers so that the people who were duped by this person can be traced. Is. A bench of Justices S Vaidyanathan and AD Jagadeesal observed that “cases of forgery in the nature of job forgery and fabrication of false documents are increasing nowadays and such persons involved in crimes should be crushed with iron hands and allowed to be set free.” will not be given." In this case, the fourth respondent produced a degree certificate, allegedly issued by Bharathidasan University, which turned out to be fake. The habeas corpus petition was filed for the production of the adopted son of the petitioner, who is said to have been illegally detained by the third and fourth respondent, before the Court. The court found that he has produced a fake degree certificate which has been made outside the court premises and claimed that he is a law graduate. The bench observed that this is indeed a case requiring registration of a criminal case and appropriate action is required against the persons involved in the production of documents. In view of the above, the bench directed the Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police to depute an officer of the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch (CCB), Chennai to produce a fabricated document before the court and conduct a thorough investigation. Diya, who will register a case and arrest the fourth respondent. The next hearing in the matter will be on 10.08.2022. Bench: Justices S Vaidyanathan and AD Jagadish Citation: HCPNo.728 of 2022007
- SC sets aside conviction, death penalty awarded to man in rape-cum-murder caseSupreme Court Judgment में·May 22, 2023SC sets aside conviction, death penalty awarded to man in rape-cum-murder case The Supreme Court has quashed the conviction and death penalty awarded to a man for the alleged rape and murder of a six-year-old girl in 2010, saying “multitudinous lapses” in the investigation have compromised the quest to punish the doer of such a barbaric act in absolute peril. Referring to the manner in which probe into the case was undertaken by the Maharashtra Police, the apex court said numerous lapses blot the entire map and there were “yawning gaps” in the chain of circumstances rendering it far from being established. A bench headed by Justice B R Gavai delivered its verdict on the appeals filed by the accused against the October 2015 judgement of the Bombay High Court which had affirmed the conviction and death sentence awarded to him by a trial court. While allowing the appeals, the top court quashed the verdict convicting the accused and directed that he be set at liberty forthwith, if not required in any other case. The bench, also comprising justices Vikram Nath and Sanjay Karol, said it was true that the unfortunate incident did take place and at a tender age of six, a life for which much was in store in the future was terrifyingly destroyed and extinguished. It said the parents of the victim have suffered an unfathomable loss, a wound for which there is no remedy. “Despite such painful realities being part of this case, we cannot hold within law, the prosecution to have undergone all necessary lengths and efforts to take the steps necessary for driving home the guilt of the appellant and that of none else in the crime,” the bench said in its judgement delivered on Friday. “There are, in fact, yawning gaps in the chain of circumstances rendering it far from being established-pointing to the guilt of the appellant,” it said. The apex court noted that an FIR was lodged in June 2010 at Thane in Maharashtra and the trial court, in November 2014, had convicted the accused and imposed capital punishment for the offence of murder. It said the courts below had concurrently found the prosecution to have established the case beyond reasonable doubt that the accused, after sexually assaulting the minor girl, had put her to death and thrown the body in a drain to destroy the evidence. The apex court noted that it was a case of circumstantial evidence, as none has witnessed the crime for which the appellant stands charged. “The prosecution case is primarily based, not on ocular evidence but on the confessional statement of the appellant leading to the recovery of incriminating articles and through scientific analysis establishing his guilt. The sheet-anchor of the case being the DNA analysis report ,” it said. The bench said even though the DNA evidence by way of a report was present, “its reliability is not infallible, especially not so in light of the fact that the uncompromised nature of such evidence cannot be established; and other that cogent evidence as can be seen from our discussion above, is absent almost in its entirety.” The bench said the reasons why the investigation officers were changed time and again were “surprising and unexplained”. It noted there was unexplained delay in sending the samples collected for analysis, the alleged disclosure statement of the appellant was never read over and explained to him in his vernacular language and what was the basis of him being a suspect at the first instance, remains a mystery.001
- Kangaroo Court?General & Legal Discussion में·August 3, 2022Recently the Chief Justice of India N V Ramana stated that the “increasing number of media trials” are proving to be impediments to justice, and that “Kangaroo Courts” run by the media are harming the democracy’s health. “I urge the media, particularly the electronic and social media, to behave responsibly,” he said at the inaugural lecture in Ranchi in honour of Justice Satya Brata Sinha. Similarly, Justice Krishan Pahal of Allahabad High Court while rejecting bail to the prime accused in Lakhimpur Kheri violence case observed in his order: “Now the problem has been multiplied by the electronic and social media especially with the use of tool kits. At various stages and forums, it has been seen that ill-informed and agenda driven debates are being undertaken by media running Kangaroo Courts.“ What exactly is a Kangaroo Court? The Oxford Dictionary defines it as “an unofficial court held by a group of people to try someone suspected of a crime or misdemeanour, especially without good evidence.” As per Merriam Webster’s Dictionary: Kangaroo Court is a mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted ORa court characterized by irresponsible, unauthorized, or irregular status or procedures In a less literal sense, it refers to proceedings or activities in which a decision is made in an unfair, biassed, and unjust manner. It is said that the kangaroo courts gained their name from their early quick and unpredictable movement from one location to another, or that they were somehow related with “jumping” (i.e., unlawfully occupying) mining claims. Kangaroo courts first appeared in the United States at the time of the 1849 California Gold Rush, and the term was first used in the southwestern United States. It first appeared in print in 1853 in a Texas book. In a Sydney Morning Herald article, Roly Sussex, Emeritus Professor of Applied Language Studies at the University of Queensland, stated, “The term first appeared in California, around 1849-1850.” At the time, there were approximately 800-1,000 Australian prospectors digging for gold. Locals quickly learned that (our forefathers) would occasionally make unofficial decisions.” Sussex contends that these people may have devised their own, fair or unfair, systems for deciding on claims to land where deposits were discovered. Another theory relates to the animal’s unusual hopping movement as well as the historical aspect. The phrase could have been used to describe proceedings in the same era, “often held by mutineers or prisoners,” including “dodgy practises by itinerant judges hopping from one jurisdiction to another,” according to Steven Poole, a journalist who writes about language and its usage over time, in The Guardian. Why the term “Kangaroo Court” is used in India? The usage of term “Kangaroo Court” in India is related to rising impact of Social and Online Media, which is not regulated very effectively. The Twitter, Facebook and other Social Media platforms are being used to judge people and create a opinion on any issue. Similarly it is being used to give Judgments/verdicts in those cases which are before the Court of Law and such verdict of “Kangaroo Courts” are usually based on ethinicity, religion and gender of the person who is being tried by such courts.003
- Article 72 of Constitution and Section 432 of CrPC Have Their Roots in Valmiki Ramayana: Justice GRHigh Court Judgment में·December 31, 2022The laws of remission in India, including Article 72 of the Constitution, which allows the President to grant pardons, and Section 432 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), which deals with remission or suspension of sentence for convicts, all have their “basis in the Valmiki Ramayana,” according to Madras High Court judge Justice GR Swaminathan on Wednesday. Justice Swaminathan was speaking at the 16th Akhil Bharatiya Adhivaktha Parishad National Conference at Kurukshetra University in Haryana on the topic ’75 Years of Resurgent Bharat: Time for Bhartiya Jurisprudence.’ In recalling an incident from 1994, when he was a speaker at an Adhivaktha Parishad meeting that year, Justice Swaminathan stated that it was during a period of peak militancy in Kashmir. Some militants had been holed up inside a mosque a few days before the meeting and had threatened security forces that they would blow up the mosque if they tried to enter, he said. He stated that the meeting was held in this context, and when it was his turn to speak, he stated that he had read Salmond on jurisprudence and Dias on jurisprudence, but he had never heard of “Biryani jurisprudence.” He also discussed the Supreme Court’s recent release of six life-term convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. He went on to say that around this time, he was reminded of a shloka from the Valmiki Ramayana in which Sita tells Hanuman that no human is perfect and that, as a result, one must abandon the idea of retaliation and instead forgive even one’s own tormentors. Justice Swaminathan referred to an article titled ‘Objection your honour’ that criticised Justice Nazeer’s statement. He urged everyone in the audience to read the text of Justice Nazeer’s statement again, translate it into their native tongues, and distribute such pamphlets to the public. Justice Swaminathan went on to say that while the current legal system has benefitted the country greatly, there is no reason why it cannot be improved. However, he added that what is required is not a blind application of ancient principles, but rather what is in tune with current needs and times. He also addressed recent disagreements between the Supreme Court collegium and Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju.He stated that every time a new Chief Justice is appointed to the Madras High Court, the Bar Association’s welcome address recounts the Tamil epic tale of Silappatikaram, in which a king dies of cardiac arrest after realising he had failed to implement due process of law and had wrongfully executed a man accused of thievery. He concluded his speech by saying that, while the country’s current legal system, including the Constitution, is a mash-up of features from several Constitutions and legal principles from western nations, our genius was in “making Bharatiya music flow out of western instruments.005
- सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने 'रूह अफजा' बनाम 'दिल अफजा' मामले में हाईकोर्ट के फैसले को बरकरार रखाSupreme Court Judgment में·May 18, 2023सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने 'रूह अफजा' बनाम 'दिल अफजा' मामले में हाईकोर्ट के फैसले को बरकरार रखा सुप्रीम कोर्ट सभी कानूनी मामलों के समाधान के लिए अंतिम मंच है। पेचीदा मामलों की एक सतत धारा यहां आती है। ऐसा ही एक मामला चर्चित शरबत ‘रूह अफजा’ से जुड़ा है। इस मामले में, सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने फैसला सुनाया कि ‘दिल अफज़ा’ नाम के शर्बत के उत्पादन पर रोक लगाने का हाईकोर्ट का फैसला सही था। इस दौरान चीफ जस्टिस की अगुवाई में तीन जजों की बेंच ने टेबल पर रखी दोनों शर्बत की बोतलों की बारीकी से जांच की. 1907 से, हमदर्द फार्मेसी रूह अफज़ा शरबत का उत्पादन और बिक्री कर रही है। 2020 में सदर लेबोरेटरीज नाम की एक कंपनी ने शरबत दिल अफजा जैसा ही एक उत्पाद बेचना शुरू किया। सदर लैबोरेटरीज ने बताया कि वह 1976 से दिल अफजा दवा का उत्पादन कर रही है। ऐसे में उसे इसी नाम का शरबत बनाने से नहीं रोका जा सकता। दिसंबर 2020 में, दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय की एकल पीठ ने सदर प्रयोगशालाओं के दावे को मंजूर कर लिया, जिससे उसे दिल अफज़ा बनाने और बेचने की अनुमति मिल गई। हमदर्द नेशनल फाउंडेशन ने हाईकोर्ट की डिवीजन बेंच में अपील दायर की। पिछले साल जारी एक फैसले में दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट की दो जजों की बेंच ने कहा था कि हमदर्द रूह अफजा एक जाना-माना ब्रांड है। एक समान उत्पाद को एक बहुत ही समान नाम के तहत बेचना एक ट्रेडमार्क उल्लंघन है। हाईकोर्ट की डिवीजन बेंच ने सदर लैबोरेटरीज को दिल अफजा शरबत का उत्पादन और बिक्री तुरंत रोकने का आदेश दिया। सदर लैबोरेटरीज ने हाई कोर्ट की डिवीजन बेंच के फैसले के खिलाफ सुप्रीम कोर्ट में अपील की। मामले की सुनवाई आज मुख्य न्यायाधीश डी वाई चंद्रचूड़, न्यायमूर्ति पीएस नरसिम्हा और जेबी पारदीवाला की खंडपीठ ने की। लंबी बहस के दौरान दोनों शर्बत निर्माताओं के वकीलों ने अपने-अपने दावों को सही ठहराया। दिल अफजा के वकील ने जजों को दोनों शरबत की बोतलें थमा दीं। इसके जवाब में मुख्य न्यायाधीश ने मजाक में कहा, “हम उन्हें ले रहे हैं, लेकिन हम उन्हें वापस नहीं करेंगे।” इसके बाद तीनों जजों ने बारी-बारी से दोनों बोतलों की जांच की। जजों ने हाई कोर्ट की डिवीजन बेंच का फैसला भी पढ़ा। अंत में, सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने फैसला सुनाया कि उच्च न्यायालय की खंडपीठ द्वारा जारी आदेश त्रुटिहीन था। हम स्थिति में हस्तक्षेप नहीं करेंगे।001
- भोपाल गैस पीड़ितों को मुआवजा देने से केंद्र को नहीं रोका : सुप्रीम कोर्टHindi law में·January 12, 2023भोपाल गैस पीड़ितों को मुआवजा देने से केंद्र को नहीं रोका : दिल्ली भोपाल गैस त्रासदी पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने केंद्र सरकार को फटकारते हुए कहा कि उसने 1984 के गैस लीक मामले के पीड़ितों को राहत देने से रोका नहीं है । कोर्ट ने कहा कि सरकार जनकल्याण के ऐसे सिद्धांत का पालन नहीं कर सकती कि वह मुआवजा राशि ( यूनियन कार्बाइड कारपोरेशन ) फर्म से लेकर ही पीड़ितों को दे । कोर्ट ने कहा कि सरकार की क्यूरेटिव याचिका के आधार पर यूनियन कार्बाइड कारपोरेशन ( यूसीसी ) से 7,844 करोड़ रुपये की अतिरिक्त मुआवजा राशि लेकर भोपाल गैस पीड़ितों को नहीं दिया जा सकता है । संविधान पीठ ने सरकार से कहा कि किसी और की जेब में हाथ डालकर पैसे निकाल लेना बहुत आसान है । पहले अपनी जेब में हाथ डालकर रकम निकालिए और पीडितों को दीजिए और फिर देखिए कि आप यूसीसी की जेब से पैसे निकाल पाते हैं या नहीं । जस्टिस संजय किशन कौल की अध्यक्षता वाली पांच सदस्यीय संविधान पीठ में शामिल जस्टिस संजीव खन्ना अभय एस . ओका , विक्रम नाथ और जेके सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने भोपाल गैस त्रासदी मामले में सरकार को जमकर फटकारा केंद्र ने क्यूरेटिव याचिका परयूसीसी से 7,844 करोड़ की मुआवजा राशि मांगी महेश्वरी ने बुधवार को केंद्र की और से पेश अटर्नी जनरल आर . वेंकटरमानी को फटकारते हुए कहा कि समीक्षा याचिका दायर किए बगैर वह क्यूरेटिव याचिका कैसे दायर कर सकते हैं । खंडपीठ ने कहा कि सरकार को पीड़ितों की आर्थिक सहायता करने से नहीं रोका जा रहा है । उनका कहना है बस इतना है कि अगर सरकार को लगता है कि पीड़ितों को और पैसा दिया जाना चाहिए तो कृपया करके उन्हें भुगतान कीजिए लेकिन यूनियन कार्बाइड की उत्तराधिकारी कंपनियों से वसूलकर उन्हें देने की बात मत कीजिए । ' आप यह नहीं कह सकते कि आप भुगतान नहीं करना चाहते हैं , ' सर्वोच्च अदालत ने कहा कि वह पहले ही क्यूरेटिव याचिका की मर्यादा पर बात कर चुकी है । कुछ छूट देने के बावजूद अदालत कानून से बंधी हुई है ।008
- इतिहास में पहली बार कोर्ट में "रोबोट वकील" करेगा बहस- जानिए ...Hindi law में·January 10, 2023अदालत में आपका प्रतिनिधित्व करने के लिए एक वकील की सेवाएँ लेना ज्यादातर लोगों के लिए हमेशा एक महंगा निवेश रहा है। लेकिन क्या होगा अगर AI (artificial intelligence)द्वारा संचालित एक रोबोट वकील होता जो किसी का भी प्रतिनिधित्व कर सकता है?यह अजीब लग सकता है, लेकिन यह अगले महीने संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका में वास्तविक जीवन में घटित होगा। फरवरी में एक अदालती मामले की अवधि के दौरान, एक प्रतिवादी को DoNotPay द्वारा बनाई गई एक कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता (AI) से सलाह प्राप्त होगी, जो कि पहली बार होने की संभावना है जब AI ने कभी भी अदालत में किसी पक्ष का प्रतिनिधित्व किया हो।न्यू साइंटिस्ट के अनुसार, एआई एक स्मार्टफोन पर चलेगा, अदालती कार्यवाही को सुनेगा और प्रतिवादी को एक इयरपीस के माध्यम से निर्देश देगा कि क्या कहना है।हालाँकि, AI बनाने वाली कंपनी DoNotPay ने अदालत के स्थान या प्रतिवादी के नाम का खुलासा नहीं किया है। 2015 में, स्टैनफोर्ड यूनिवर्सिटी के एक कंप्यूटर वैज्ञानिक जोशुआ ब्राउनर ने कैलिफोर्निया में DoNotPay की स्थापना की। वह चाहता है कि बचाव पक्ष के पैसे बचाने के लिए उसका ऐप वकीलों को पूरी तरह से बदल दे।कंपनी के अनुसार, “DoNotPay दुनिया के पहले रोबोट वकील का घर है। एक बटन के स्पर्श से, आप निगमों से लड़ सकते हैं, नौकरशाही को हरा सकते हैं और किसी पर भी मुकदमा कर सकते हैं।”कंपनी के संस्थापक और मुख्य कार्यकारी अधिकारी, जोशुआ ब्राउनर का दावा है कि DoNotPay के AI असिस्टेंट को केस लॉ में कई तरह के मुद्दों पर प्रशिक्षण देने और यह सुनिश्चित करने में काफी समय लगा कि ऐप सच है।“हम अपने कानूनी दायित्व को सीमित करने की कोशिश कर रहे हैं, और यह अच्छा नहीं है अगर यह तथ्यों को तोड़-मरोड़ करता है,” उन्होंने समझाया।002
- प्रधानमंत्री मोदी ही करेंगे नई संसद का उद्घाटन: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने भारत के राष्ट्रपति द्वारा उद्घाटन..Hindi law में·May 26, 2023प्रधानमंत्री मोदी ही करेंगे नई संसद का उद्घाटन: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने भारत के राष्ट्रपति द्वारा उद्घाटन की मांग वाली जनहित याचिका ख़ारिज की आज सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने एक जनहित याचिका में सुनवाई की, जिसमें यह निर्देश देने की मांग की गई थी कि नए संसद भवन का उद्घाटन भारत के प्रधानमंत्री श्री नरेन्द्र मोदी के बजाय भारत कि राष्ट्रपति द्रौपदी मुरमू द्वारा किया जाना चाहिए। हालांकि, जस्टिस जेके माहेश्वरी और जस्टिस पीएस नरसिम्हा की पीठ ने एडवोकेट सीआर जया सुकिन द्वारा दायर जनहित याचिका पर विचार करने के लिए अनिच्छा व्यक्त की, जिसके परिणामस्वरूप मामले को वापस ले लिया गया। याचिकाकर्ता ने भारत के संविधान के अनुच्छेद 79 का हवाला दिया, जो यह बताता है कि संसद में राष्ट्रपति और दो सदन शामिल हैं, यह तर्क देते हुए कि राष्ट्रपति को भवन खोलना चाहिए क्योंकि वह कार्यकारी प्रमुख हैं। याचिकाकर्ता की दलीलों के बावजूद खंडपीठ ने याचिकाकर्ताके मामले को वापस लेने के फैसले को रिकॉर्ड करने के बाद याचिका को खारिज कर दिया। यह जनहित याचिका 18 मई को लोकसभा सचिवालय द्वारा जारी एक बयान की प्रतिक्रिया थी, जिसमें घोषणा की गई थी कि नए संसद भवन का उद्घाटन 28 मई को प्रधान मंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी द्वारा किया जाएगा।याचिकाकर्ता ने दावा किया कि इस बयान ने संविधान का उल्लंघन किया क्योंकि इसमें राष्ट्रपति को आमंत्रित नहीं किया गया था। याचिकाकर्ता ने तर्क दिया कि राष्ट्रपति के बजाय प्रधान मंत्री को आमंत्रित करना एक अपमान और संविधान का उल्लंघन है, समावेश की भावना को कम करता है जिसने राष्ट्र को अपनी पहली महिला आदिवासी राष्ट्रपति का जश्न मनाया।विरोध के बावजूद पीठ याचिकाकर्ता की दलीलों से सहमत नहीं थी और याचिका खारिज करने की ओर बढ़ रही थी, तभी याचिकाकर्ता ने मामले को वापस ले लिया।001
bottom of page